关于辩论赛的作文|描写辩论赛的作文（共105篇）_200字|300字|400字|500字|600字
>> 关于辩论赛的作文|描写辩论赛的作文
关于辩论赛的作文|描写辩论赛的作文
关于 辩论赛 的作文
描写 辩论赛 的作文
因版面所限，本页仅为您呈现了最多60篇最新发布的，如果想要浏览更多相关作文，请使用右侧或作文搜索引擎进行搜索。本站作文虽然不乏优秀之作，但仅为同学们学习交流的习作，不能当作范文使用。
收藏本页到：
/ 小学生作文 800字
作文预览：今天，我们班开了一场辩论赛，主题是&开卷是否有益&。正方的观点是&开卷有益&，反方的观点的&开卷未必有益&。我支持反方，则加入了反方。&辩论赛现在开始。&rd…
/ 小学生作文 800字
作文预览：三门海游小学五（9）班马千珊“大家好，我们今天的辩论主题是上网有益与上网未必有益。”随着我响亮的话语，我们的辩论赛开始了。正方的一辩首当其冲，发表了自己的看法。反方的一辩也紧接其后……到了自由…
/ 小学生作文 2900字
作文预览：我的想法是：一些不健康的书，看了使我们会变坏，好书才有益，所以，读书不是肯定有益的网上资料：开卷有益&听起来没有什么毛病，可细心一想，毛病就出来了。怎么能说只要看书就对我们有益呢。书有好…
/ 小学生作文 2900字
作文预览：我的想法是：一些不健康的书，看了使我们会变坏，好书才有益，所以，读书不是肯定有益的网上资料：开卷有益&听起来没有什么毛病，可细心一想，毛病就出来了。怎么能说只要看书就对我们有益呢。书有好…
/ 小学生作文 1200字
作文预览：今天下午第二节课，我们全班召开了一次辩论赛。辩题是&爱与被爱，哪个更幸福&，总共分了四场，为了这次辩论赛大家都做了充分的准备，作为反方的我也查了许多资料，来证明&爱与被爱，被爱…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：一场针锋相对的辩论赛麻城市英才小学五（四）班戴博要放假了，我们班举行了一场辩论会，辩论的内容是：零食可不可以吃？辩论会开始前同学们叽叽喳喳议论着，零食可以吃，还是不可以吃呢？辩论会开始了，教…
/ 小学生作文 1000字
作文预览：这一次，我们班上开展了一次非常有趣的&辩论赛&&&今下午的第二节课。这一次辩论赛的主题是：讲诚信与善意的谎言。别提有多有趣，有多好笑了！让我先来给你详细讲解一下。正方是支…
/ 小学生作文 900字
作文预览：正方观点：人要讲诚信。反方观点：人有时候也要说一些善意的谎言。主持人：&讲诚信与善意的谎言&辩论赛开始！下面由正方首先发言。正方主辩：我方认为人应当讲诚信，正所谓&诚信乃为人之…
/ 小学生作文 400字
作文预览：班级辩论赛今天，我们班级围绕着课文《乌塔》，进行了一次别开生面的辩论赛。我是正方的一辩，也是组长。辩论赛一开始，正反双方就围绕“乌塔一个人出去旅游，会不会遇到坏人”这个命题，展开了激烈的辩论…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：一次有趣的辩论赛这一次，我们班上开展了一次非常有趣的“辩论赛”――今下午的第二节课。这一次辩论赛的主题是：讲诚信与善意的谎言。别提有多有趣，有多好笑了！让我先来给你详细讲解一下。正方是支持讲…
/ 小学生作文 300字
作文预览：今天下午的作文课，老师让我们进行了一场辩论赛，事情是这样的。我于小雅和刘伟东是正方，唐杰和叶扬是反方。我们这次的辩论题目是小学生是否因该做家务。我们的代表是于小雅对方是唐杰。他们说着说着就大…
/ 小学生作文 300字
作文预览：今天下午的作文课，老师让我们进行了一场辩论赛，事情是这样的。我于小雅和刘伟东是正方，唐杰和叶扬是反方。我们这次的辩论题目是小学生是否因该做家务。我们的代表是于小雅对方是唐杰。他们说着说着就大…
/ 小学生作文 1000字
作文预览：&人们常说开卷有益，也有人说开卷未必有益，看了那些不健康的书反而有害，你对这个问题怎么看？我们可以展开一次辩论会&。这是语文书上的导语，我们班就展开了一次精彩了辩论会。我们的题目是…
/ 小学生作文 900字
作文预览：星期五下午最后一节可，我们班开了一次别开生面的辩论赛&&&叮铃&&&上课了，老师说：&此次辩论赛开始。&她用炯炯有神的眼神看着我们，我们讨论的是《…
/ 小学生作文 1900字
作文预览：&耶！耶！耶！&此时，男生营里正传出忘乎所以的欢笑声，此次带头将军施袁双楠正举手欢呼，仿佛正在灌着一杯一杯美酒，庆祝今天的圆满胜利。故事追随到公元2012战争发生之前，世界还是和平的时…
/ 小学生作文 1000字
作文预览：时间：星期六学校操场上午8：00辩论题目：有好奇心好还是没有好奇心好参加选手：甲组：我，王xx张xx乙组：王xx潘xx梁xx主持人：吕xx主持人：&现在我宣布，五年二班第三届辩论会正式开始。参赛选手分…
/ 初中作文 1100字
作文预览：“双向四车道、一级公路标准、双侧对称安装国内最长太阳能路灯线的333省道穿场而过，不仅大大提升了农场的文化品位，而且一下子缩短了家乡与城市的距离。我每周去台城学琴的时间单趟就缩短了半个小时。而且…
/ 初中作文 1100字
作文预览：“双向四车道、一级公路标准、双侧对称安装国内最长太阳能路灯线的333省道穿场而过，不仅大大提升了农场的文化品位，而且一下子缩短了家乡与城市的距离。我每周去台城学琴的时间单趟就缩短了半个小时。而且…
/ 小学生作文 1200字
作文预览：“双向四车道、一级公路标准、双侧对称安装国内最长太阳能路灯线的333省道穿场而过，不仅大大提升了农场的文化品位，而且一下子缩短了家乡与城市的距离。我每周去台城学琴的时间单趟就缩短了半个小时。而且…
/ 小学生作文 500字
作文预览：星期五的班队课上，我们班以&善意的谎言有没有错&举行了一场辩论赛。&丁零零&，上课铃响了，辩论赛正式开始，我属于正方，支持善意的谎言，因为我觉得人有时在出于好意时撒一些谎…
/ 小学生作文 600字
作文预览：今天是一个惊心动魄的日子，今天每个人的情绪都涨到了高潮，今天每个人都紧张无比，今天每个人都拭目以待。那就是&&我们要开辩论会了。我们辩论的主题的科技发展是利大还是弊大。正方主题科技…
/ 小学生作文 1100字
作文预览：我们班这周五举行了班级辩论赛，原本计划好的秋游计划因为一场莫名的雨给淋没了，我的心情就和乌云一样黑，当张老师宣布周五要考试的时候我的心情就像乌云后边的电闪雷鸣，还说要举行什么刘乐夫提议的&ldq…
/ 小学生作文 900字
作文预览：星期五下午，我们五（6）班和五（4）班举行了一场非常激烈的辩论赛，主题是&生活中应不应该做好事&。我是反方一辩，支持生活中不应该做好事。其余的反方成员是：二辩：润雨u；三辩：王佳英；…
/ 小学生作文 500字
作文预览：最近几天，许多家庭忙着购买年货，给节日增添了不少喜庆的氛围，可是我妈妈却说：“今年春节一点气氛也没有。”为什么妈妈说没有气氛呢？我就去请教了一下表姐，表姐说：“现在都什么年代了？还过这种传统…
/ 小学生作文 600字
作文预览：今天本该是普通的一天，可因为一个小小的插曲而变得有趣。因为我提议举行了一场家庭辩论赛，爸爸妈妈受不了我的死缠硬磨和糖衣炮弹便答应了。因为我最近因为寒假作业太多了而烦恼所以这次的辩论主题是写作…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：星期五，我们班举行了一次&开卷有没有益&的辩论大赛。我报名参加了反方论辩，经过事先的准备，我将在这次辩论赛中大显身手，锻炼和发挥自己的口才能力。正反两方选手分好次序后，就准备各自辩…
/ 小学作文 1400字
作文预览：今天，我背着书包，哼着小曲儿来到学校。总觉得今天的空气是那么清新，天空是那么明朗，世界是那么可爱。这是为什么呢？告诉你吧，那是因为呆会儿我们班将要举行一场――五〈5〉小小辩论赛。事情是这样的。…
/ 小学生作文 800字
作文预览：&开卷有益&，&开卷未必有益&。一阵又一阵的辩论声从我们五（6）班的教室里传出来。原来我们正在进行开卷是否有益的辩论赛呢！一二大组是正方，坚持开卷有益的观点，而我们三四大组…
/ 小学作文 500字
作文预览：星期五，老师组织了一场辩论赛，题目是“乌塔该不该独自旅游”。我参加了反方。开始几分钟，正方就显出了他们咄咄逼人之势，想让我们无还手之力，而我们面对这强大的攻势采取了灵活的策略D紧紧咬住他们的…
/ 小学作文 500字
作文预览：星期五，老师组织了一场辩论赛，题目是“乌塔该不该独自旅游”。我参加了反方。开始几分钟，正方就显出了他们咄咄逼人之势，想让我们无还手之力，而我们面对这强大的攻势采取了灵活的策略D紧紧咬住他们的…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：老师伴随着上课铃来到了教室，并笑容可掬的说：&同学们，这节课举行一场辩论赛，辩论话题是：电脑游戏是否利大于弊？一二组为正方，观点是电脑游戏利大于弊，三四五组则相反。&交代清楚后，便…
/ 小学生作文 800字
作文预览：一场有趣的辩论赛资兴市一完小五(3)班:袁子翔“我方认为……”我们认为……”你听到了吗?你猜我们在干嘛?对,我们正在进行一场有趣的辩论赛！我们这次辩论赛的主题是：过生日该不该请同学。王老师作为这场辩…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：一场有趣的辩论赛资兴市一完小五（4）班陈柏润今天的课别开生面，老师要组织同学进行一次口才和思维的锻炼，来一场辩论大比拼。老师先把同学们分成正反两方，正方命题是《过生日要请同学》，反方则是《过生…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：父母对你的爱是伟大的，也是不可缺少的。如果，在你身边只有母亲对你的鼓励，那么你会被骄傲引入歧途。如果，在你身边只有父亲不满的评语，那么你也许会对生命失去信心。可如果让你挑其中一个，你会选谁呢…
/ 小学生作文 500字
作文预览：403班朱兆锐甲（正方）：我实在想有个星期八，让我痛快的玩一天，无忧无虑的自由一天。乙(反方)：不对，有星期八才不好呢！玩玩玩，你就知道玩，不会有星期八的，你就学习吧！学习也是一种快乐你懂不懂?甲…
/ 小学生作文 400字
作文预览：12月31日，借元旦联欢的时间，我班开展了一次别开生面的辩论赛。本次辩论赛的主题是“素质教育好还是应试教育好”,正方观点是：素质教育好。反方观点是：应试教育好。我班男女同学各派五名代表进行辩论,本…
/ 小学生作文 1000字
作文预览：精彩的辩论赛――四平小学六年级马语卓辩论赛大家肯定都在电视上观看过吧!那激烈的场面，那紧张的气氛，辩手们个个咄咄逼人的气势，使观众们都无不折服。今天，我们班举行了一次小小的辩论赛，主题是“科技…
/ 小学生作文 900字
作文预览：辩论赛高亭中心小学六（2）班张朔萌今天下午第四节课，经过六（2）班门口，你一定会听到里面“激烈”的“争吵”，那是我们班正展开的一场辩论赛。语文园地三的交流平台上要求班级里展开一场辩论赛，这么好…
/ 小学生作文 1100字
作文预览：小小辩论赛高亭中心小学六（2）班魏金潇唉!今天一天下来,就一个字“累”啊!上课根本打不起精神来,浑身上下一片酸痛,大概是因为昨天的那节体育课吧!真是“人老了,体力不如前了”啊!呵呵!不过,下午的那场小小…
/ 小学生作文 500字
作文预览：――之大的好还是小的好今天是星期六，我和爸爸、妈妈组织了一个家庭辩论赛马，妈妈是裁判。她写了五组对抗赛的题目。这次是第一次，共有五次。大让小，所以这次的主办场地是我的卧室，我准备好了裁判桌与…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：5月4日，我们班开展了一场激烈的辩论赛。这次辩论赛等的辩题是科技发展给我们带来的是利大还是弊大。正方认为科技发展利大，而反方认为科技发展弊大。做为主持人的我宣布辩论赛开始。刚一开始正方一辩就争…
/ 小学生作文 800字
作文预览：难忘的辩论赛9月12日上午，我们班举行了此学期第一次辩论赛，主题是&开卷有益&与&开卷未必有益&。我荣幸地成了反方辩手。一开始，我方的四位辩手趾高气扬地入场，而对方有三位辩手…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：本周班队课上，我班开展了一场有关猪和狗，篮球和排球的辩论赛。全班同学被拉分成甲乙两方。第一回合：猪狗争论。甲方（狗），乙方（猪）。甲乙两方各抒己见，畅所欲言，连平时在课堂上不太举手的同学也大…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：今天下午，我们班举行了一场辩论赛，辩题是“开卷是否有益”。我有幸地被选为反方辩手。由于赛前我准备了许多开卷未必有益的事例，因此对这场比赛很有信心。比赛开始了，正方于晴为主辩，反方我为主辩。正…
/ 小学生作文 800字
作文预览：今天下午第三节课，我班举行了一次辩论赛。辩题是开卷是否有益。我被光荣地选为辩论手。我们是正方，我想，只要有足够的资料，很棒的口才，仅应力强，就能大获全胜。可是，事实并非如此。比赛开始了，我们…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：今天下午第三节课，我班举行了一次辩论赛。辩题是开卷是否有益。我被光荣地选为辩论手。我们是正方，我想，只要有足够的资料，很棒的口才，仅应力强，就能大获全胜。可是，事实并非如此。比赛开始了，我们…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：今天下午，我们班举行了一场辩论赛，辩题是“开卷是否有益”。我有幸地被选为反方辩手。由于赛前我准备了许多开卷未必有益有益的事例，对这场比赛很有信心。比赛开始了，正方于晴为主辩，反方我为主辩。正…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：今天下午，我们班举行了一场辩论赛，辩题是“开卷是否有益”。我有幸地被选为反方辩手。由于赛前我准备了许多开卷未必有益有益的事例，对这场比赛很有信心。比赛开始了，正方于晴为主辩，反方我为主辩。正…
/ 小学生作文 800字
作文预览：科技是“弊大”吗？！――记一次难忘的辩论赛六（2）王城如果问我，科技是“利大”还是“弊大”，我会毫不犹豫地说利大，但是也有一些人认为科技的发展是弊大于利。为判定科技到底是利大还是弊大，我们班在…
/ 小学生作文 600字
作文预览：今天，我看了一场辩论赛。这可不是我们小孩子们玩的“辩论”，这可是世界级的超级辩论赛！在这次辩论赛中，正方是新加坡大学队，他们的观点是应以成败论英雄；反方是中国武汉大学队，他们的观点是不能以成…
/ 小学生作文 400字
作文预览：星期五班会课上，我们班举行了一场别开生面的辩论会，主题是：玩电脑有害还是有益。接下来主持人给我们分了组，第一大组和我所在的第二大组是反方，我们的观点是：玩电脑游戏是有益的；第三大组和第四大组…
/ 小学生作文 600字
作文预览：家庭辩论赛对于怎样读书、怎样选书这两个问题我们全家展开了激烈地辩论。关于怎样读书这个问题，妈妈认为在课堂上认真听老师讲课，上课的时候对于老师提出的问题应该积极举手发言，上课45分钟非常重要。课…
/ 小学生作文 700字
作文预览：科技发展利大还是弊大？不同人有不同的回答。上周，我们班级就这个问题展开了激烈的辩论。为了这次辩论，双方都做好了充分的准备。我方辩手所持的观点是“科技发展利大于弊”。辩论开始了。我方辩手首先发…
/ 小学生作文 800字
作文预览：一场辩论赛（31600）浙江省宁海县实验小学教育集团实验校区五（1）班裘涵韵“我们认为男生好，因为……”“我们不赞同这个观点……”这场激烈的辩论赛《男生好还是女生好》在葛老师家进行着，这场比赛已经…
/ 小学生作文 500字
作文预览：最近，班里举行了一场“开卷是否有益”的辩论赛。辩论的过程精彩而激烈。张涛、黄熙等同学认为开卷未必有益，他们认为很多书都不适合青少年读，有些人读了武侠、漫画甚至黄色书籍，弄得不思学习，缺乏睡眠…
/ 小学生作文 400字
作文预览：今天下午第二节课，我在多功能室观看了一场精彩的辩论赛。辩论赛的主题是：小学生应不应该追赶时尚.正方观点是：小学生不应该追赶时尚，应该把精力放在学习上，不应该用父母的血汗钱来买那昂贵的，色彩斑斓…
/ 小学生作文 600字
作文预览：一场精彩的辩论赛昨天，我看了一场精彩的辩论会。“咚”的一声，辩论会开始了。这一次辩论会的主题是“小学生应不应该赶时尚”，正方辩论小学生不应该赶时尚，而反方辩论的是小学生应该赶时尚。首先是正方…
/ 小学生作文 400字
作文预览：今天，我去参加了一场短暂而精彩的辩论赛，可那只是一个赛前的总排练，但是我还是兴致勃勃地想：总排练我能看到，可以说是非常幸运的啦！原来，可以观看这场辩论赛的只有我们六（2）班，六（4）班和六（5）…
/ 小学生作文 900字
作文预览：一场激烈的辩论赛今天，我们老师留了一项作业。以自己出去旅游，跟妈妈展开激烈的辩论赛。回到家里，我看见妈妈正在看书，便走上前去。&妈妈，过几天我想出去玩一玩，可以吗？&我说。妈妈想了…
/ 小学生作文 1000字
作文预览：&叮铃铃，叮铃铃&&&清脆悦耳的上课铃声响了，同学们像小鸟一样飞进了教室，这时，虞老师推开们，大步流星地走上讲台，对同学们说：&同学们，昨天我叫你们去准备：&…
Copyright &
www.govyi.com
All Rights Reserved E-mail:重新申请了一个号专门放奥瑞冈/政策性辩论视频，ID全国政策性辩论邀请赛
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_1.html' cid='、第五届世界华语辩论锦标赛半决赛《新加坡国立大学VS中国人民大学》寒门难出贵子/寒门不难出贵子
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_2.html' cid='、第五届世界华语辩论锦标赛半决赛《中山大学VS香港大学》娱乐化辩论节目是辩论之福/祸
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_3.html' cid='、第五届世界华语辩论锦标赛 小组赛 《中国传媒大学 VS 中国矿业大学》爱情之美在于瞬间/永恒
4、第五届世界华语辩论锦标赛小组赛《马来亚大学VS北京师范大学珠海分校》人际交往中，隐忍/坦率更能消解矛盾
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_5.html' cid='、2015星辩3.0 半决赛(一) - BoomShakalak VS 恐龙复生队
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_6.html' cid='、2015星辩3.0复赛 恐龙复生 VS 西南UEK
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_7.html' cid='、星辩3.0复赛：童男童女VS活泼老僵尸-金钱是万恶之源
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_8.html' cid='、2015星辩3.0决赛 恐龙复生VS活泼老僵尸
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_9.html' cid='、2015年亚太大专华语辩论赛七 A组初赛1 重庆大学VS新南威尔士大学
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_10.html' cid='、2015年亚太大专华语辩论赛七 D组初赛2 香港浸会大学VS墨尔本大学
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_11.html' cid='、2015年亚太大专华语辩论赛七 D组初赛3 中国政法大学VS台湾大学
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_12.html' cid='、2015年亚太大专华语辩论赛七 半决赛E1 新加坡国立大学VS香港大学
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_13.html' cid='、2015年亚太大专华语辩论赛七 半决赛E2 中国政法大学VS马来亚大学
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_14.html' cid='、2015年亚太大专华语辩论赛七 循环赛D4(3) 中国政法大学VS香港浸会大学
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_15.html' cid='、2015年亚太大专华语辩论赛七 循环赛B4（1） 马来亚大学VS莫纳什大学
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_16.html' cid='、015国际华语辩论邀请赛 复赛第二场 中国人民大学vs中山大学 推动社会制度演进应该/不应该追求社会福利
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_17.html' cid='、2015国际华语辩论邀请赛初赛B组第一场台湾大学VS武汉大学 徒有勇气or徒有智慧更可悲
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_18.html' cid='、2015国际华语辩论邀请赛 初赛D组第三场 中山大学VS马来亚大学 人生追求应以道德成就/建功立业为重
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_19.html' cid='、2015国际华语辩论邀请赛 初赛日F组第一场 台湾东吴大学VS马来西亚国能大学 利己/利他是更好的生存策略
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_20.html' cid='、2015星辩3.0 半决赛(二) - 复仇者联盟 VS 活泼老僵尸
<option value='/video/av3527801/index_21.html' cid='、風雲再起國際華語辯論邀請賽初賽A組：馬來亞大學vs新加坡國立大學
视频地址复制
Flash地址复制
Html地址复制
离线看更方便
用或其他应用扫描二维码
夏惟桐学长推荐理由：这是一场引发很多讨论的比赛，评委之间也经过了激烈的争执。颜如晶在输了这场比赛后，将星辩第一轮的题目也定成了“无愧于心/尽如人意”。这个题目在世锦赛打了4场，在星辩打了二十多场，大家可以各自比较一下不同的立论、战术和攻防。
广播电视节目制作经营许可证：（沪）字第1248号
| 网络文化经营许可证：沪网文[6号 | 信息网络传播视听节目许可证：0910417 | 互联网ICP备案：沪ICP备号-3 沪ICP证：沪B2- | 违法不良信息举报邮箱： | 违法不良信息举报电话：转3
公司名称：上海宽娱数码科技有限公司 | 公司地址：上海市杨浦区政立路485号 | 客服电话：赞助商链接
当前位置： >>
2002年全国大专辩论赛预选赛第4场 2002 national college
2002年全国大专辩论赛预选赛第4场 2002 national college-level debate on the N o. 4 qualifying tournament field 正方:中国人民大学现代社会更需要通才 Square: Renmin University of China in m odern society need generalist 反方:北京外国语大学现代社会更需要专才 Counter-party: Beijing Foreign Studie s University, a modern society need professionals 一辩立论阶段 A defense argument phase 正一：大家好！ Is one: Hello, everyone! 现代社会更需要通才还是专才呢？ A mo dern society need generalists or professionals? 要看他们谁更能促进现代社会 的良性运行和可持续发展。 Who better to look at them to promote the healthy operation of modern society and sustainable development. 所谓专才是指在某一 个专业领域具有较多专业知识，较熟练专业技能的人才。 The so-called profession als are the means of a professional field in a more professional knowledge, professional skills than skilled personnel. 而所谓通才是具有广阔的知识平 台，丰富的知识储备和多种技能的人才。 Tong is the so-called broad knowledge platform, rich reserves of knowledge and a variety of skills. 简单说来， 通才 知识综合化，技能多样化，适应变动的能力强。 Put simply, integration generali st knowledge, skills, diversity, ability to adapt to change. 好的！ Nice! 谈现代社会，良性运行和可持续发展是现代社会的首要要求。 Talk ab out modern society, the sound operation and sustainable development are the primary requirements of modern society. 高度分工是现代社会的一个显著特征。 A high degree of division of labor in modern society, a prominent feature. 但是高度整合更是现代社会的一个首要的突现的要求。 However, a high degree of integration is first and foremost a modern society, emergent requirements. 社会分工造成了细化， 可是如果细化产生的碎片没有能够得到整合， 我们去哪里寻找整 个社会的良性运行和可持续发展呢？ Social division of labor created a refine d, but not if the refinement of the resulting debris can be integrated, we go looking for a virtuous society as a whole operation and sustainable deve lopment? 社会分工每走一步，带来对整合的要求就更高。 Social division of labo r at every step, bringing even higher demands on the integration. 这个时候 不同分工之间是不是需要有沟通？ This time the division of responsibilities i s needed between the communication? 不同学科之间是不是需要有融合呢？ Betwee n the different disciplines is the need for integration? 那么具有广阔知识平 台、丰富知识储备的通才和只具有单项技能、单项知识的专才相比，谁更能在不同分工 之间实现沟通？ Then with a broad knowledge platform, rich stock of knowledg e of the generalists and only have a single skill, knowledge and expertise than individual, who better to achieve communication between the different division of labor? 谁更能在不同学科之间完全融合？ Who is more fully integra ted between the different disciplines? 是通才！ Is a generalist! 因此现代社 会的良性运行和可持续发展，更需要通才！ Therefore, the sound operation of mo dern society and sustainable development, but also need to round! 第二、让我们来看看现代社会发展的原动力――创新。 Secondly, let us take a lo ok at the driving force behind the development of modern society - innovation. 从古代科学的综合，到近现代科学的分化，再到当今科学新一次的综合。 From t he ancient science integrated, to the differentiation of modern science, to present a comprehensive new scientific one. 各个学科森严壁垒、各自为政的状 况已经不复存在了，我们看到各个学科相互沟通、相互交融、相互渗透。 Various di sciplines fortified barriers, fragmented situation has ceased to exist, and we see that the various disciplines communicate with each other, interacti ng with each other mutual infiltration. 而当今创新的点正是出现在不同思想， 不 同领域，不同学科相互交叉、沟通、融合、综合的地方。 The point of today&#39;s inn ovation is in a different ideology, different areas, different disciplines intersect, communication, integration, integrated place. 那么宽口径、厚基础 的通才们是不是要比那些窄口径的专才们更具有实现创新的能力呢？ So wide calibe r, thick-based generalists who is not than the narrow-caliber professionals who have more to achieve innovative capacity? 所以现代社会的突破和进取更需 要通才。 Therefore, breakthroughs and progress in modern society need gener alists. 再次、让我们来看看现代社会一个现实的问题――人才流动频繁。 Again, let us lo ok at modern society, a practical problem - people frequently move. 美国人 一生之中要变换工作7到8次，随着中国市场经济的不断进步，产业结构调整，职业结构 调整的不断深化，我们发现跨行业、跨领域的人才流动日益频繁。 Americans, their lives have to change jobs 7-8 times, with the constant progress of China&#39;s market economy, industrial restructuring, vocational deepening of structura l adjustment, we found that cross-sectoral, interdisciplinary flow of talen t become increasingly frequent. 这个时候， 多种技能的通才是不是要比那些只具有 一项技能的专才，更能适应现代社会的变动呢？ This time, the pass is not a mul ti-skilled than those who only have a skilled professionals, to better adap t to modern society changed? 综上我们发现，不管是从宏观的社会角度，还是从微 观的个人角度，都能证明现代社会更需要的是通才！ To sum up we find, whether f rom a macro-social perspective, or from the micro-personal point of view, c an attest to the needs of modern society is even more versatile! 最后我有两点需要指出： Finally, I have two points should be noted: 第一、我们说每一个人都有一个专门的岗位，所以我们不能认为一个人，在一定时期内 做了一样工作，他就是专才，否则世界上没有通才了，对不对？ First, we say that everyone has a special position, so we can not believe that a person, in th e same period of time doing work, he is professional, otherwise there is no round the world, right? 第二、我们说每一个人都有一个主导的专业，所以我们不能说有了一个主导的专业，这 个人就是一个专才，否则这个世界上又没有通才了。 Secondly, we say that everyo ne has a leading professional, so we can not say that have a leading profes sional, this person is a professional, otherwise there is no liberal in the world. 此二点容易混淆，敬请对方辩友注意。 The two-point confusion, please note tha t the other defense-you. 谢谢！ Thanks!反一：谢谢主席，各位评委大家好！ Anti-a: Thank you, Madam President, Honora ble judges Hello, everyone! 我方的观点是现代社会更需要专才。 Our view is th at modern society need professionals. 首先非常感谢对方辩友为通才和专才下了 一个很不错的定义。 First of all very grateful to the Friends of each other&#39; s defense and professionals to the next round a very good definition. 只不 过我们的专才被对方辩友看得很扁， 我们的专才只是小小的一个专业领域的才， 而不知 道其他方面的东西，是一个窄口径的才，而不是一个宽基础的才。 This is our deba te on the other side of the post was only the Friends look very flat, and o ur professionals is only a small area of a professional before, without kno wing other things, is a narrow-caliber before, rather than a broad-based on ly. 这样的才不叫专才，专才是建立在广博基础之上在某个领域作出突出贡献的人才， 只有这样的才，才叫才！ This was not called professionals, expertise is buil t on a broad basis to make outstanding contributions to the field of talen t, the only way to be, be called before! 不然的话，恐怕连“才”都称不上。 O therwise, I am afraid that even &only& are can not be called. 那么今天既然 比较专才和通才，我们就必然要知道，专才和通才之间有相对的优势。 Well, since today more professionals and generalists, we are bound to know, between pro fessionals and generalists have a comparative advantage. 专才是指某个领域的 专门高精尖人才， 而通才是指多个领域之间的通用人才。 Specifically refers to a particular area of expertise is the high-caliber talent, while the pass is the mean between the common people in many fields. 两者有相对优势，专才相对 于通才的优势在于他的知识更加精深， 专才比之于通才， 他的劣势在于他的知识不如通 才广博。 Both have a comparative advantage, expertise relative to the gener alist has the advantage of his knowledge is more intensive, specialized tha n the generalist in his disadvantage is his extensive knowledge than genera lists. 只有在这样有长有短的基础上， 我们才可以讨论现代社会更需要什么样的才。 Only in this way may be long or short, based on the modern society we can d iscuss what kind of need it. 那么现代社会更需要什么样的才呢？ So what kind of a modern society need to be then? 我们看看什么是现代社会的特性。 We look at what are the characteristics of modern society. 对方辩友说得很好，现代社 会是一个很大很大的系统，现代社会是一个丰富多彩的巨系统。 You put it very we ll argue the other side, modern society is a very big system, modern societ y is a colorful giant system. 首先、分工的细化，体现了更精细地呈现世界的真实，现代社会表现出的是多样性、复 杂性、意志性和不可预测性。 First of all, the detailed division of labor ref lects a more sophisticated manner with a world real, modern society is demo nstrated by the diversity, complexity, and will not be predictable. 分工需 要专才，社会发展简史告诉我们，社会发展是呈螺旋状上升，而社会分工是呈树冠状发 展，因此社会发展需要扩大再生产，扩大再生产需要社会分工，社会分工直接要求的就 是专才， 这一点对方辩友也看到了。 Division of labor needs for professionals, and social development brief history tells us that social development is a spiral up, and social division of labor is the coronary tree was developed, the social development needs to be expanded reproduction, expanded reproduction in need of social division of labor, social division of labor is the direct request of professionals This debate-you have seen the other side.作者：221.203.230.* Authors: 221.203.230 .*
02:33 回复此发言 Reply to this statement2 22002年全国大专辩论赛预选赛第4场专才与全才 2002 national college-level debate, the first four games qualifying tournament professionals and all-rounder 那么我说第二点、现代社会要求分工，当然也要求整合。 Well, I said the second point, the division of labor demands of modern society, of course, also requires cons olidation. 难道专才就做不到整合吗？ Is integration of professionals, fail to d o? 我们说分工不等于分裂。 We say that the division of labor is not equal split. 分工要求的是更加有效的合作，大家想到整合，第一个想到的当然是合作，而合作谁更有效 率？ Division of labor demand is more effective co-operation, we think of integ ration, the first thought of course, co-operation and co-operative who is more efficient? 当然是专才了，现代社会当然更需要专才了。 Of course, professionals, an d modern society, of course, need professionals. 第三点、现代社会是一个知识大爆炸的社会，知识大爆炸的社会有什么特征？ Thirdly, mo dern society is a large explosion of knowledge society, knowledge society, what the big bang features? 专业知识不断丰富和深化，这对一个人在某个领域内，投入的能 力和精力有着更加高的要求，我不能穷尽一生来同几个领域，那就穷尽一生，来精通一个领 域，专才成为需要也成为了必然。 And constantly enrich and deepen the professional knowledge, which a person in a given area, the inputs have a significantly hig her capacity and energy requirements, I can not come with a few areas of life, exhausted, it would exhaust a lifetime to master one area of expertise a need t o also become the inevitable. 对方辩友的论证其实恰恰说明了专才的重要性。 Friends of the arguments in fact argue the other side just shows the importance of pro fessionals. 我方认为，现代社会对专才有着史无前例的渴望，因为只有专才，才能适应这 样的社会需求；因为只有专才，才能够推动这个社会不断向前，因此我方认为现代社会更需 要专才。 Our view, modern society, professionals have an unprecedented desire, b ecause only professionals can adapt
because only professi onals can promote this society continues to move forward, so that a modern soci ety need our expertise . 谢谢！ Thanks! 攻辩阶段 Debate stage attack （一） (A) 正二： 第一个问题， 请问为什么现在高中取消了文理分科？ Are two: The first question, I ask why are high school canceled the Arts Division? 高考进行了大综合小综合？ College Entrance Examination conducted a large integrated small integrated?反二：我觉得综合并不是一个通才的趋势，我倒是看到了贵校有这么多大学本科的专业，我 还看到了您的硕士也分工越来越细，您的博士呢？ Anti-2: I think it is not a compreh ensive generalist trend, I&#39;d see your school there are so many undergraduate pr ofessional, I also saw your master&#39;s division of labor has also become ever sma ller, and your Doctor do? 细上加细！ Fine&#39;s refinement! 所以我方认为现代社会的教 育的趋势不是向通，而是向专，是一专多能的专。 Thus our view that the trend of edu cation in modern society and not to pass, but to post, is multi-skill expertis e. 正二：对方辩友认为综合不是通才，好！ Are two: the other side of Friends believe that integrated is not a generalist debate, good! 喜欢谈大学教育，我们就谈大学， 为什么现在的高校当中，文理渗透，理工结合，流行辅修制、双学位？ Like to talk abou t university education, we talk about university, why are colleges and universi ties among the liberal arts infiltration, Polytechnic combination, popular mino r system, the double degree? 反二：辅修制在贵校如何开展，我不是很清楚。 Anti-2: Minor system on your school h ow to proceed, I am not very clear. 我可以介绍一下北外的情况。 I can describe th e situation outside the North. 北外开了比如说：人体美学、音乐欣赏、西方美术鉴赏 这样的辅修课。 For example, the North opened the outside: the human body aesthet ics, music appreciation, the West such a minor art appreciation classes. 我学了 西方美学和人体美学，并不是说要用来培养我的英语水平，而是说培养我的兴趣，开阔我的 视野，提高我的欣赏品位，让我在以后紧张的工作之余可以有一个很高雅，很不错的艺术欣 赏的休息。 I studied the body of Western aesthetics and aesthetics, not to say t hat should be used to train my English, but that cultivate my interest, broaden my horizons, improve my appreciation of taste, I can spare time in the future tense there is a very elegant, very nice art appreciation rest. 正二：对方辩友的知识真是够丰富了，那么第三个问题，请问对方辩友，通才教育的模式， 是不是当今教育的发展趋势？ Are two: Friends of the knowledge of the other debat e is really rich enough, then the third question, does the debate the other Fri ends of general education model, is not the development trend of education toda y? 反二：其实很抱歉，通才教育是一个错误的翻译，英语的原文是 Generalknowledge 而是一 个通识教育，对方辩友这两个是完全不同的概念。 Anti-2: Actually, I am sorry, liber al education is a bad translation of English text is Generalknowledge but a gen eral education, the other side argued that the two friends are completely diffe rent concepts. 正二：对方辩友说大家都翻译错了，那通识教育是不是要培养通才？ Are two: the other side argue that we have translated the wrong friends, and that general educatio n is to train generalists? 反二：通识教育是建立一个在有许多知识面的基础上，专一门的专才，他是一个高要求的专 才，我们现代社会就是需要这样的专才。 Anti-II: General Education is to create a W hen there are lots on the basis of knowledge, specific expertise in the door, h e was a demanding professionals, our modern society is the need for such profes sionals. 正二：通识教育是为了培养专才，为什么不叫专识教育？ Are two: general education isto train professionals, why not ask specifically Liberal Education? （二） (B) 反二：请问我们的教育是不是应该努力培养社会更需要的人才？ Anti-2: Is our educatio n is not a society should strive to foster a greater need for qualified personn el? 是或者不是！ Yes or not! 正二：当然是。 Are two: Of course yes. 反二：我知道您是学法律的，那我想请问《中国高等教育法》第五条对大学教育的目的做了 什么样的规定呢？ Anti-2: I know you are learning the law, then I would like to ask, &Chinese Higher Education Act,& Article V of university education, the pur pose of doing what kind of regulations? 正二：我记得**在“七.一”讲话时说：要把大学生培养成为具有人文精神、科学素养和创 新型的高素质人才。 Are two: I remember ** in the &7. A& speech, said: Students s hould develop into a human spirit, scientific literacy and innovative high-qual ity personnel. 反二： 《中国高等教育法》第五条规定：大学的教育是以培养创新性实践性的高级专门人才。 Anti-2: &China&#39;s Higher Education Act,& Article V states: university education is to foster innovative hands-on high-level expertise. 请问对方辩友这句话作何 解释呢？ Will the debate the other Friends of the phrase for what interpretatio n? 正二：请问对方辩友专门人才等于专才吗？ Are two: Will the debate the other Friend s of expertise mean that professionals do? 虽然专才比通才在专业上有更多的知识， 跟更高的技能，但是要把专门的工作做好，在现代社会更需要的是沟通协调，更需要的是整 合创新，更需要的是整体性思维，宏观性把握，而这通才能做得更好。 Although the prof essionals in more than generalists have more professional knowledge, with highe r skills, but should do a good job specialist in modern society is a greater ne ed for communication and coordination, greater need for the integration of inno vation, greater need for the holistic thinking, macro grasp, which pass in orde r to do a better job. 反二：请问对方辩友，对知识的精深掌握是不是在这里进行突破和创新的必要条件？ Anti2: Will the debate the other Friends of deep grasp of knowledge is not here to breakthroughs and innovations in the necessary conditions? 正二：是，怎么样才能够突破跟提升呢？ Are two: Yes, how can we break through with the upgraded? 就是要借鉴和吸纳别的学科的东西，就需要站在人类的整体跟宏观的思维 把握才能够突破呀！ Is to learn and absorb what other disciplines, you need to st and for mankind as a whole with the mind to grasp the macro can break 呀! 对方辩 友理论上的突破跟技术上的创新，现代社会是不是越来越多地出现在学科与学科的交叉地 带？ Friends of the theory argue the other side of the break with the technical innovation, modern society is more and more and more appear in the intersectio n of disciplines and subject areas? 是不是越来越多地出现在学科与学科的空白地带 呢？ Is more and more appear in the margins of disciplines and subjects do? 这 就是通才的创新。 This is the generalists innovation. 反二：请问对方辩友，我是用心专一地做一个专才更精深呢？ Anti-2: Will the debate t he other friend, I was single-minded intention to do a more intensive professionals do? 还是把我的时间精力铺散开来，做一个通才做得更精深呢？ Or take my time an d energy to shop spread out and do a more intensive round doing it? 正二：对方辩友是不是要跟我们谈一个时间跟精力的问题呢？ Are two: Friends of the d ebate the other side is not Yaogen we are talking about a time with the energy problem? 那就搞不懂了…… It do not understand the ... ... （三） (C) 正三：第一个问题，日本人忧心忡忡地提出了一个2006年通才危机问题，请问对方辩友对此 如何理解？ Are three: the first question, the Japanese are worried about put fo rward a generalist crisis in 2006, may I ask how to understand the other side o f this debate the Friends?作者：221.203.230.* Authors: 221.203.230 .*
02:33 回复此发言 Reply to this statement3 32002年全国大专辩论赛预选赛第4场专才与全才 2002 national college-level debate, the first four games qualifying tournament professionals and all-rounder 反三： 我也知道日本是全世界职业教育最发达的地区， 日本战后重建主要靠的就是职业教育， 他们有世界上最优秀的职业工人呀！ Anti-3: I also know that Japan is the world&#39;s m ost developed area of vocational education, mainly by Japan&#39;s post-war reconstr uction is that vocational education, they have the world&#39;s best professional wo rkers 呀! 正三：对，有一句话流传得非常广，叫做：综合就是创新，交叉就是创新，渗透就是创新。 Are three: Yes, there is a word very widely spread, called: Comprehensive is i nnovation, cross is innovation, and infiltration is innovation. 日本人忧心忡忡 的恰恰是自己国民的创新能力。 The Japanese are worried about is precisely the abi lity to innovate its own nationals. 那么请问对方辩友，你认为人的创造性思维是从何 而来的呢？ So I ask the other side argued friend, do you think people&#39;s creativ e thinking has actually come from? 反三：人的创造性思维一定要对本领域有专厚的认识，如果对这个领域不够了解的话，又谈 和创新呢？ Anti-3: human creative thinking must be thick in this field special knowledge of, if not in this field to understand the words, but also to talk ab out, and innovation? 正三：对方辩友显然回避了我的问题，那么我再来问第三个问题。 Are three: You obviou sly argue the other side to evade my question, I again ask the third question. 请问对方辩友加入 WTO 以后你认为对我国的人才提出了哪些新的要求？ I ask friends to join WTO after the debate the other side do you think people made our country w hat new requirements? 反三：幸好人事部副部长告诉过我们：现代社会最需要的人才有两样。 Anti-3: Fortunate ly, the vice minister of Personnel told us: in modern society most people havedifferent needs. 第一样是 WTO 专业人才，第二样是专业技工。 The first is the WTO, like professionals, and the second sample is a professional mechanic. 我对此还 是比较理解的。 I am still quite understandable. 正三：那么最后一个问题，现代社会分工是细化了，但是分工的细化，是不是突出了整合性 的要求？ Are three: So last question is the detailed division of labor in moder n society, but the detailed division of labor, is not it highlights the integra tion requirements? 这不仅是系统能告诉我们的，也是辩证法告诉我们的，那么请问对方 辩友，专才如何适应这一要求的？ This is not only the system can tell us, is also a dialectic tells us, then ask the other side argued Friends of professionals h ow to adapt to this requirement? 反三：的确每一次我们说综合就必然会想到合作，而专才不能合作吗？ Anti-3: Indeed, e very time we said that the combination will inevitably think of co-operation, w hile the professionals can not co-operate? 我们想一想一个集体，总是有主管财务的， 主管驾驶的，主管公关的这样的人才来构成，才能构成一个公司难道我们需要的都是通才 吗？ We consider a collective, there is always in charge of finance in charge o f driving in charge of public relations talent to such a composition, in order to constitute a firm are generalists do we need to do? 那一个 CEO 就够了。 That a CEO is enough. （四） (D) 反三：请问如果你我两个人，一起开一家电脑软件公司，您会倾向于首选雇佣通才呢还是专 才呢？ Anti-3: What if two people you and I together to open a computer softwar e company, you tend to hire generalists preferred it, or professionals? 正三：我当然看如果这个人，他的知识综合化，他的技能多样化，他的适应能力又强，我认 为这就是我最合适的人选。 Are three: I certainly see if this person, and his know ledge of integration, his diverse skills, his ability to adapt another strong, I think this is my most suitable candidates. 反三：好，那就是说我们更需要通才，随着公司的规模发展，我们是需要顺应现代企业的制 度，更加雇佣一些专门的人才，还是继续雇佣通才呢？ Anti-3: Well, that is to say we need generalists, with the size of the company development, we need to adapt t o the modern enterprise system, even hiring a number of specialized personnel, or continue to hire generalist do? 正三：对方辩友似乎告诉我们说，通才在现代企业制度中就不能合作了，那我就不明白了， 通才他有更广阔的知识平台。 Are three: You seem to argue the other side told us t hat the generalist in the modern enterprise system can not co-operation, and th en I do not understand, he has a broader generalist knowledge platform. 他可以 更好地与人沟通，与人合作。 He can communicate better with people, work with othe rs. 甚至还可以迈入管理阶层。 You can even enter management. 让我这个大公司变得更 好，这不就是通才的定义吗？ Let me the big companies to become better, is not tha t the definition of generalists do? 反三：一个人是不是应该追求通化？ Anti-3: A person who is not should pursue Tongh ua? 正三： 我认为一个人确实应该追求通化， 这恰恰是马克思最终理想告诉我们人应该全面发展。 Are three: I think a person should really pursue Tonghua, this is precisely the ultimate ideal of Marx tells us that people should round development. 反三：一个宠物医生，他本来会治疗各种宠物的病，现在是不是要让他也学会给人开刀呢？ Anti-3: a pet doctor, he would have treated a variety of pet illness, now is n ot let him have learned to give the cut? 这样就能更适应现代社会的要求，成为了通 才了呀！ This would also meet the requirements of modern society has become a ge neralist in 呀! 正三：对方辩友是不是认为通才是全知全能的上帝呀？ Are three: the other side argue You is not that the pass is the omniscient God? 今天我没事造一架飞机，明天呢？ Today, I am nothing to build a plane tomorrow? 我又给心脏病人没事换个瓣儿搭个桥 之类的，对方辩友对通才理解太过偏激。 I gave heart disease Baner nothing to take a bridge from another class, and the other Friends of generalist understanding of defense too extreme. 攻辩小结阶段 Summary stage attack debate 正一：大家好，我想首先有一个概念要明晰，就是细化带来的是什么？ Is one: Hello eve ryone, I would like to have an idea to be clear, that is, refined to bring abou t? 简单地应用系统论我们就能知道，细化带来的是对整合更高的要求。 A simple applica tion of systems theory we will know that refinement is caused by integration of higher demand. （取出一张纸）这是社会某一个具体的领域，像对方辩友所说的，现在它 细化了（把纸撕碎） (Taking out a piece of paper) This is a specific area of soc 。 iety, such as Friends of the debate the other side said, now it refined the (te ar the paper). 如果我们社会要求的不是他们作为碎片，各自为政，而是要求他们整合起 来，共同发挥作用，那么首先的问题是什么？ If our society is not claiming them as fragments of co-ordination, but rather ask them to integrate and jointly play a role, then the first question is what? 是如何将他们合起来。 Is how they are com bined. 现在又细化了（再次撕纸） ，现在高度细化了（再次撕纸） Now refine the (re-S 。 izhi), now a high degree of refinement of the (again Sizhi). 我再问一遍，如果这 个社会要求的不是每一个碎片各自为政，而是要求他们整合起来，发挥共同的作用，那么首 选的问题是什么？ I ask again, if the social requirements of each fragment is no t fragmented, but require them to integrate together to play a role, then the p referred What is the problem? 是如何将他们合起来。 Is how they are combined. 谢 谢！ Thanks! 现在我要解析对方辩友说的两个问题： Now I have to resolve each other&#39;s defense, s aid Friends of the two questions: 第一、对方辩友老跟我说“专门专门专门”我就很奇怪了，我今天专门是来辩论的，对方辩 友告诉我说： “你专门辩论的专才！ ”我明天专门回去读书，对方辩友说了： “你专门读书的 专才！ ”我明天专门去吃饭，对方辩友说： “你！专门吃饭的专才！ ”这是怎么回事呢？ Firs t, an old friend told me the other side argued that &special special special& I &#39;m very surprised, and I specifically came to the debate today, the other party debates Friends told me: &You dedicated professionals in the debate!& I&#39;ll go back to school special the other side argue the Friends said: &Your expertise i n the specialized reading!& I&#39;ll specifically go to eat, argue the other side Y ou say: &You! dedicated professionals to eat!& This is how it&#39;s going on? 现在我们和在座的各位再讲一个创新的问题。 Now we are here and you repeat that oneof innovation. 我们说今天社会讲创新那些新到底出现在哪里？ We say that those ne w to innovate in today&#39;s society in the end appear? 是出现在那些跨学科，跨领域的 地方，那么请对方辩友正面回答我，您的专才是怎么个跨法！ That appears in those int er-disciplinary, cross-cutting areas, then please answer my friends the other d ebates, your expertise is how inter-law! 能不能跨好呢？ Can cross well? 好了，小 结至此，感谢在座各位！ Well, summary of this point, thank all of you! 谢谢！ Tha nks! 反一：谢谢主席，下面由我做攻辩小结。 Anti-a: Thank you, Madam President, I have done the following attack by the defense summary. 我发现对方的一辩很喜欢撕纸，我 可舍不得撕这张纸，当年这张纸是蔡伦一个人做的，今天这张纸要伐木工人，造纸工人各个 专才一起合作才能做，对方把细化比喻为裂化，分裂！ I found the other one liked Siz hi debate, I can not bear to tear the paper, when a person&#39;s invention of this paper is to do, today, the paper should be loggers, paper workers in the variou s professionals working together can do, the other side to refine compared to c racking and splitting! 我们社会的分裂是这样的吗？ Division of our society is s o? 我们社会整合是专才的合作，这样才有更高的效率呀！ We are professionals, social integration, cooperation, so that it can more efficient 呀! 对方辩友听到了吗？ You hear the other side argue it?作者：221.203.230.* Authors: 221.203.230 .*
02:33 回复此发言 Reply to this statement4 42002年全国大专辩论赛预选赛第4场专才与全才 2002 national college-level debate, the first four games qualifying tournament professionals and all-rounder 然后我来解释我方的问题： Then I explained our problem: 我方刚才从法律层面提出了高等教育法的规定，按我们书文解释的方法来解释以下高级、专 门、人才。 Our side just from the legal dimensions of the higher education law, according to our interpretation of the text book way to explain the following h igh-level, specialized, and personnel. 高级指高精尖，专门当然是指专业，人才嘛， 顾名思义还是人才！ High refers to highly sophisticated, specialized course refer s to professional, qualified personnel Well, by definition, or talent! 那当然是 高精尖的专才了，大学培养的不是高精尖的专才，难道还是万金油的通才吗？ It would ce rtainly be top-notch professionals, and university-trained professionals is not sophisticated, can do, or Tiger Balm generalist? 当然不是，而且我方辩友提出了一 个两个人开公司的问题，大家想一想，现实中是不是有这样的例子？ Of course not, but our defense made a Friends of two people to open the company&#39;s problems, we thi nk, in reality, is there such examples? 当年比尔.盖茨跟保罗.爱伦两个人开了电脑 公司，这家电脑公司现今拥有当今最好的管理人才，当今最好的软件人才，当今最好的财务 人才，他就是首屈一指的微软，这就是专才的作用，这不是通才能够达到的，对方的通才只是一个幻梦，如果我们人类永远在通才的幻梦中徘徊的话社会就永远得不到前进，所以现代 社会更需要的是我们专才！ That year. Bill Gates with Paul. Ellen opened two compu ter companies, this computer company now owns the best management talent, today &#39;s best software talent, today&#39;s best financial talent, he is the leading Micro soft, This is the role of professionals, it is not round can be achieved, and t he other side of the generalist is a dream, if we human beings forever wanderin g round the dream, if society never get ahead, so a greater need for a modern s ociety is that we professionals ! 谢谢！ Thanks! 自由辩论： Freedom of debate: 正：对方辩友一开始就犯了一个错误，他们告诉我专职就等于专才，他们说，伐木工人因为 他在伐木，所以他就是一个伐木的专才，那我就不明白了，我们著名的愚公精神的马永顺， 十几年前是伐木工人现在又是种树工人。 Are: the other side argued the beginning of Friends made a mistake, they told me the same as a full-time professionals, th ey say, because he was logging loggers, so he is a logging professionals, then I do not know, and we well-known The Foolish Old Man spirit of Ma Yongshun, log gers more than a decade ago and now is the tree planters. 对方辩友可不要告诉我 说，十几年前他是伐木专才，现在他是种树专才。 You can not argue the other side to ld me that 10 years ago, he was logging professionals, and now he is planting t rees professionals. 那么我想请问对方辩友这样一个问题，现代社会变动性是一个最大的 特点。 Well, I would like to ask a question each other&#39;s friends argue that mode rn society is one of the biggest changes in sexual characteristics. 请问对方辩 友专才如何适应？ Will the other side argue Friends of the professionals how to adapt? 反：这个社会是具有变动性的，我们变动的社会是应该做好自己的专业知识以适应社会的变 动呢，还是十鸟在林呢？ Counter: This community is a change in nature, changes in our society should do their own expertise to adapt to social changes, or is 10 birds in the forest do? 我们知道，十鸟在林不如一鸟在手呀！ We know that 10 bird s in the forest better than a bird in the hand 呀! 我倒是请问对方辩友， 对方一辩说 创新是在跨学科、跨领域的地方。 I&#39;d ask the other side argued friend, the other o ne argue that innovation is in an interdisciplinary, cross-cutting areas. 我就 不太清楚了，我的导师他在语法甚至研究一个词都可以研究出来全国震惊的学术效果，他需 要跟英语还是跟法语去跨学科呢？ I was not sure, my mentor in his study of gramma r or even one word can study shocked the country out of the academic results, h e needs to go with the English or French, multi-disciplinary it now? 正：所谓女怕嫁错郎，男怕入错行。 Is: The so-called women are afraid to marry the wrong Lang, male fear choosing the wrong. 我们多一个选择多一个机会，难道不更适 应现代社会的发展吗？ We have one more opportunity to select more than one, it n ot better adapted to modern society development? 反：机会每个人都遇见，但不能每个人兑现。 Counter: the opportunity to meet everyo ne, but not everyone realized. 我倒想起一句话，狭路相逢专者胜；通才尽管笑，可惜 笑得早；通才不惭，专才在后；只有真较量，才是真内行。 I would think of a word, th eir territories, spe generalist while laughing, smiling Un fortunately, generalists are not ashamed, profe only real contest is the real experts. 正： 对方辩友一直在跟我说合作， 我想给大家指出这样一个问题， 合作是不是要制度来维系？ Are: Friends of the other debates have been told me that cooperation, I&#39;d like to point out that such an issue, cooperation is not to the system to be mainta ined? 而这个合作的制度的维系， 是不是要靠通才来指出， 靠通才来发展， 靠通才来维系呢？ And this co-operation to maintain the system, is not to rely on generalists to point out, rely on generalists to develop and rely on generalists to be mainta ined? 反：对方辩友谈合作，我们就来谈合作。 Anti: You talk about each other&#39;s defense c o-operation, we will talk about co-operation. 请问在合作之中，到底是专才还是通才 哪一个更能避免重复的劳动呢？ Will the co-operation among professionals or gener alists in the end is which one can avoid duplication of the labor force? 正：对方辩友，假如我是通才，我跟你合作，我能够了解你的知识，我能够更理解呢，难道 我不能跟你更好地沟通？ Are: the other side argued friend, If I were generalist s, I have co-operation with you, I can understand your knowledge, I can better understand it, can I can not tell you communicate better? 难道我们不能更好地把 工作做好吗？ Can we not do better do a better job? 通才具有整体性宏观性思维，才 能够合作得更好呀！ Macro-rounder with a holistic thinking, be able to cooperate more okay! 反：您懂我了，我当然很开心。 Anti: You understand me, I am of course very happy. 但是我更希望您把您自己专业先做好呀！ But I also want you to put your own profes sional do first okay! 请问对方辩友，今天一直告诉我们，某一个人是通才，他都不需要。 Will the debate the other Friends, today&#39;s been telling us that an individual is a generalist, he does not need. 我们今天辩题是，社会更需要通才。 Today, we de bate, the community will be more need for generalists. 请问您这个更是如何比较 呢？ I ask you this is how the comparison? 正：我们已经有无数的学科和无数的专业向我们证明，现在的创新点越来越多地出现在交叉 学科、交叉领域内。 Is: We already have numerous disciplines and numerous profess ional to prove to us, and now more and more innovation in point appears in the cross-disciplinary, cross-field. 请问对方辩友，是不是能和我们一样认为，通才在这 些领域里更能够大展身手，自由驰骋呢？ Will the debate the other friends, is not a ble to share our view that generalists in these areas better able to show its m ettle, the free gallop then? 反：再次请问对方辩友，不要回避我方二辩的问题，您怎么来论证现代社会更需要通才呢？ Anti: You debate again, I ask each other, do not evade the issue of our two de bate, how do you also need to prove the generalist in modern society do? 这个更 字如何体现？ Reflect this more characters, how? 正：我来告诉在座的各位和对方辩友，现代社会更需要一个人具有整合的能力；现代社会更 需要一个人具有创新的能力；现代社会更需要一个人能适应变动。 Is: I am here to tell you and the other debates friend, a modern society need a person has the a modern society need a person has the mode rn society need a person to adapt to change. 这不就是更吗？ Is not that even d o? 我说了好几次了，对方辩友。 I said several times, and the other defense-you. 反：谢谢对方辩友！ Counter: Thank you, argue the other side of Friends! 对方辩友告诉我们的是，现代社会需要一个上帝，因为上帝它可以一个人整合所有的东西。 Friends tell us the other side argued that modern society needs a God, because God can a person integrate everything. 那么我们要告诉对方辩友，现代社会需要合作。 So we have to tell the other side argued friend, a modern society requires cooperati on. 借用网易的一句话：网聚人的力量，这才是我们的力量！ Netease borrow a phrase: Fabric person&#39;s strength, this is our strength! 正：对方辩友，我们要的通才，可从来没有说通才是全才、通才是天才、通才是万斤油呀！ Are: the other side argued the Friends, we have to generalist may have never s aid that Tung is the all-rounder, Tung is a genius, Tung is 10000 kg oil 呀! 对 方辩友今天总跟我们说，有专业所以他就专才。 You argue the other side told us toda y that the total should have a professional so he professionals. 那我就搞不懂 了，反方四位辩手、我方四位辩手、台上的主席、台下的评委每一个人都有一个专业。 The n I do not understand, and counter-side four estimated participant, our four es timated participant, the Chairman of the stage, the audience judges each indivi dual has a profession. 对方辩友偏偏告诉我们，我们大家都是专才呀！ You argue the other side happens to tell us that we are all professionals 呀! 看来只有那些小学 生中学生还没有专业的叫通才呀！ It seems that only those primary school students have not yet called a professional generalist 呀!作者：221.203.230.* Authors: 221.203.230 .*
02:33 回复此发言 Reply to this statement5 52002年全国大专辩论赛预选赛第4场专才与全才 2002 national college-level debate, the first four games qualifying tournament professionals and all-rounder 反：我倒想起龚自珍的一句诗：我劝天公重抖擞，不拘一格降人才。 Anti: Well, I think Gong Zizhen of a poem: I entreat the heavenly God re Dousou, stick to one patt ern down talent. 请问对方辩友，不拘一格怎么解释？ Will the debate the other frie nd, stick to one pattern how to explain? 如果都是通才的话，三人行三人全师，一个 东西大家都明白，天公还有没有一点个性？ If you are generalists, then, the three l ines all three divisions, one thing we all understand that there is no God ther e is a little personality? 正：通才当然是不拘一格，今年北大中文系也开始招收理科生。 Is: of course, stick to one pattern-rounder this year, Beijing University&#39;s Chinese department also be gan to recruit engineers. 我想在现代战争中，大口径的炮当然比小口径炮火力更大我今 天就不明白，为什么我多一点知识，他就变得不好了呢？ I think in modern warfare, la rge-caliber guns of course, a greater force than the small-caliber artillery fi re today, I do not understand why I have a little more knowledge, he becomes ba d then? 反：对方辩友把专才脖子上的那根绳子勒得越来越紧，专才都透不过气来了。 Counter: Fr iends of the debate the other professionals in the Okanagan a rope around his neck Le increasingly tight, professionals can hardly breathe come. 既然对方辩友 回答不了不拘一格，我们就看事实层面。 Since the debate the other Friends of the a nswer can not stick to one pattern, we will look at the facts level. 我是武汉 人，我知武汉事。 I was in Wuhan, I know something of Wuhan. 武汉今年的人才需求表 上，排名第一的是高级技工，人才缺口达到5万人。 Wuhan this year&#39;s talent needs tab le, ranking first in the senior technicians, talent gap reach 5 million people. 请问对方辩友如何解释这一现象呢？ Will the debate the other Friends of how to e xplain the phenomenon? 正：我终于明白对方辩友为什么认为通才不需要了，因为他认为，通才根本就实现不了，通 才是全知全能的上帝。 Is: I finally understand why the other side argued that the generalists do not need friends, because he believes that is simply impossible to achieve all-round, Tung is the omniscient and omnipotent God. 要把国图所有 的书都看完， 才叫一个通才。 We should all of the books on the country map reading, can be called a generalist. 那我们今天的通才教育岂不是最大的悲哀？ That Would not today&#39;s liberal education is the greatest tragedy? 反：武汉的人才市场对方辩友拒绝回答。 Anti: Wuhan, Friends of the talent market e ach other&#39;s defense refused to answer. 那好，我们来看深圳。 Well, we look at She nzhen. 深圳某企业出16万，愿意雇佣高级钳工，他不需要掌握英语。 An enterprise in S henzhen plus 16 million, are willing to hire high-level fitter, he does not nee d to master English. 这样的一个专业人才，对方辩友又作何解释呢？ Such a professio nal talent, the other defense-you, what explanation do? 正：谢谢主席，各位评委、嘉宾，各位同学，大家晚上好。 Is: Thank you, Madam Presid ent, distinguished judges, guests, students, everyone Good evening. 很荣幸，今天 能在这里和对方辩友讨论全才和专才谁更能适应社会竟争这一问题。 Very honored to be here today, and the other defense Friends and professionals to discuss all-roun der who can adapt to the social competition arising therefrom this issue. 我方 认为，全才更适应社会竞争。 Our view, all-rounder to better respond to competitio n. 在进入正题前有必要说明一点：我们今天讨论的辩题他已经承认了我们所要讨论的那个 主体，也就是那个人，已经成材了，并且已经成为了一个全才或者专才。 Into the thesis before the need to clarify one point: we are discussing today&#39;s debate that he has admitted that we have to discuss that subject, that is, that person has be come useful, and also has become an all-rounder, or professionals. 因此，我们今 天在这里不需要再讨论一个人能否成为全才或者专才的可行性。 Therefore, we do not ne ed to be discussed here today, a person can become all-rounder, or the feasibil ity of professionals. 我方认为，全才是指有一个主导专业，同时精通其他多个专业的复合型人才。 Our view, t he whole is that there is a leading professional, proficient in many other prof essional at the same time compound talents. 而专才指在某一个专业领域具有较多专 业知识的专业人才。 The expertise that a professional in a field of more speciali zed knowledge professionals. 要看谁更能适应社会竞争，主要是看谁被社会淘汰的几率 更小。 To see who can better adapt to social competition, mainly to see who be e liminated by a smaller chance. 下面我将从以下两个方面阐述我方观点： Now I will s et out our view the following two aspects: 第一、社会的就职岗位具有有限性。 First, the social status has a limited nature of the inauguration. 我们都知道，任何事物总有饱和的时候，社会不可能会无限制地提供就职岗位，因此我们的 就职岗位也是有限的。 We all know that anything there is always saturated, the co mmunity&#39;s unlikely to deliver unlimited office positions, so our post office is also limited. 我们打一个比方（二辩取出图版）我们所说的全才就相当于这里的杂食性 动物，而专才则相当于肉食性或草食性动物，当食物资源短缺的时候，你说是哪种动物更能 适应自然界的竞争呢？ We are playing an example (two debates out plates) is equi valent to what we call the all-rounder here, omnivorous animals, while the prof essionals are the equivalent of carnivorous or herbivorous animals, when the sh ortage of food resources, when you say what kind of Animals can adapt to the na tural world competition? 答案毋需置疑，当然是杂食性动物。 The answer without dou bt, of course, omnivorous animals. 由图中我们可以知道，杂食性动物拥有更多的选择。 From the figure we can see that omnivorous animals have more choices. 我们的全 才也是这样，全才在社会竞争中拥有更多的选择，他也定会更适应社会竞争。 The same is true of our all-rounder, all-rounder in the social competition have more choic e, he would certainly be more to adapt to the social competition. 第二、社会具有变动性与不可预测性。 Secondly, the community has a change in sexua l and unpredictable. 20世纪的风风雨雨，跌跌宕宕，谁也没想到从农业时代到工业时代后又到信息时代，一切都 是变化的那么快，谁又能预测21世纪的社会呢？ Of the 20th century ups and downs or the ups and dang, no one thought from an agricultural age to the industrial age into the information age, then, everything is changing so fast, who can predic t the 21st century society? 在这个信息时代所发生的一切更恐怖，大波动、大破产、大 流转……一时另人眼花缭乱、目不暇接。 In this information age, what happened is m ore terror, large fluctuations, large bankruptcy, another big turnover of peopl e ... ... 1:00 dazzling, dizzying. 试问对方辩友：如何才能在当今这个剧烈变动与不 可预测的社会中立足呢？ How can argue the other side of Friends: How can this dr astic change and in today&#39;s unpredictable society based on it? 很显然，唯一可靠 的方法就是，多学几手，多专多能。 It is clear that the only reliable way is to le arn a few hands, more specifically multi-energy. 最后我有三点想要补充： Finally, I would like to add three things: 第一、今天我们所谈是人才的适应性，不要过多地谈论社会的需要性。 First, today we a re talking about the adaptability of talent, not too much to talk about the nec essity of the community. 因为，社会具有变动性与不可预测性，社会今天需要的是搞核 武器的，可能明天需要的就是防御计算机病毒的人才。 Because the community has a cha nge in sexual and unpredictable nature of society today is the need to engage i n nuclear weapons may be tomorrow&#39;s need is a computer virus defense personnel. 第二、我们说每一个人都有一个专门的岗位，所以我们不能认为一个人，在一定时期内做了 一样工作，他就是专才，否则世界上没有全才了。 Secondly, we say that everyone has a special position, so we can not believe that a person, in the same period of time doing work, he is professional, otherwise there is no all-rounder in the w orld. 第三、我们说每一个人都有一个主导的专业，所以我们不能说有了一个主导的专业，这个人 就是一个专才，否则这个世界上又没有全才了。 Thirdly, we say that everyone has a leading professional, so we can not say that have a leading professional, this p erson is a professional, otherwise there is no all-rounder in the world. 以上三点敬请对方辩友注意。 Please argue the other side for more than three frien ds pay attention. 谢谢！ Thanks! 反：谢谢主席，谢谢对方辩友的精彩发言。 Counter: Thank you, Mr President, I thank the wonderful friends to speak each other&#39;s defense. 我方观点是：专才更适应社会 竞争。 Our view is that: professionals more responsive to social competition. 全才是指全面发展的人才，他是对各个领域都有所涉猎的知识面广博的复合型人才。 All-r ound development of human resources is the means, he is all areas of knowledge are studied under a broad range of compound talents. 专才是指在一定知识基础平台上在某一个专业领域具有较多的专业知识,较熟练专业技能的 人才。 Specifically refers to a certain knowledge base is the platform of a prof essional field in a more professional knowledge, professional skills than skill ed personnel. 讨论全才和专才谁更适应社会的竞争的问题，我们需要注意到全才和专才是 两个互有长短的概念，正是这个让我们的辩论变得有意义。 And professionals to discus s all-rounder who is more responsive to competition in the community, we need t o take note and post-rounder is the length of two inter-concept, it is this deb ate so that we become meaningful. 而这两个概念的侧重点不同，一在全，一在专。 The focus of these two concepts different from one in the whole, one in the post. 其中间有一专多能或多专多能的概念，但这不应该是争论的焦点，全能而无一专不现实，一 专外无一能也不可能，这个辨题中，全在于广博、专在于精深。 In which there are mult iple function rooms or more specifically the concept of multi-energy, but it sh ould not be a bone of contention, all-round without a special unrealistic, no o ne can be a post outside the impossible, the identified problem, the whole is b road, Profile is deep. 我们所要论证的是对某领域知识精深的理解比广博的知识面更加 适应社会竞争。 We want to argue that the domain knowledge of a deep understandin g of a broad range of knowledge than the more responsive to social competition. 在这里我们不是比较“多”与“一” ，而是要比较的是“全”与“精” Here, we would n 。 ot compare the &more& and &one&, but to compare the &full& and &fine.&作者：221.203.230.* Authors: 221.203.230 .*
02:33 回复此发言 Reply to this statement6 62002年全国大专辩论赛预选赛第4场专才与全才 2002 national college-level debate, the first four games qualifying tournament professionals and all-rounder 所谓适应社会竞争在于顺应社会的需要。 The so-called social competition is to adap t to meet the needs of the community. 适应社会需要的人才才更具有竞争力。 Meet th e talent needs of the community is more competitive. 而在当今信息爆炸的时代，对 人才的要求越来越高，我方认为，专才更适应社会竞争。 In today&#39;s information explosion era, have become increasingly demanding of talent, our side believes that p rofessionals to better respond to competition. 第一，随着社会分工的细化，与分工相对应的知识结构也越来越细，故专业也向更加复杂的 方向发展。 First, with the refinement of social division of labor, and division of labor corresponding to the increasingly detailed knowledge of the structure, so the profession to a more complex direction. 对人才的要求同样趋于细化，趋于更 高，因此对人才专业化的要求是十分明显的。 The same demands on talent tends to ref inement, tends to higher, and therefore the requirements of professional talent is very obvious. 第二，专才拥有某一领域内的专业知识和技能，会比全才更具有吸引力。 Second, the pro fessionals, with a particular field of expertise and