罪与错 Crimes and Misdemeanors
罪与错的图片
······
罪与错的获奖情况
······
第62届奥斯卡金像奖
最佳导演(提名)
第62届奥斯卡金像奖
最佳男配角(提名)
第62届奥斯卡金像奖
最佳原创剧本(提名)
喜欢这部电影的人也喜欢
······
评论被折叠，是因为发布这条评论的帐号行为异常。评论仍可以被展开阅读，对发布人的账号不造成其他影响。如果认为有问题，可以豆瓣电影。
关于《罪与错》的问题
· · · · · ·
罪与错的影评
······
人的一生会遇到这样那样的事，只不过下层人民不善表达，生活的喜怒哀乐都融进了血液，上层人的光线与阴暗都深深埋葬于岁月之中，唯有中产，董文学，会文艺，诗词书画样样精通，可以通过各种形式表现人声的飞扬与落寞。
中产的思想很复杂，他们有一定的财富积累，有一定的社会地位，受过高等教育，看待问题早脱离了简单的才米油盐范围。对文学、艺术等方面的素养.........
16/16&有用
这可能是伍迪彻底告别过去的一部电影。
对伯格曼的戏仿以及由此带来的信仰讨论问题依旧，但他已不再执着于上帝是否存在，而是何时出现（犯罪之后），存在于何处（一颗受过宗教影响但从不信仰，却由于罪恶突然开始忏悔的心）。眼科医生的故事各种《罪与罚》上身，陀爷伯格曼老伍迪永远是三位一体，OMG。
伍迪早已认定情幻虚空，这一点从他自己的（据说从《星尘往事》起，他.........
“我们一生中都要不断面对痛苦的抉择、道德抉择。有的选择还意义重大，大部分都是鸡毛蒜皮的小事，但是，我们做什么样的选择就决定了我们是什么样的人。我们实际上是我们所做的选择的总和，世事难料，生活也有诸多不平之事，在上帝造物的时候，仿佛没有考虑到人类幸福这件事，只有靠我们自己每个人爱的能力不同才会赋予这个无情的宇宙以意义。但是，大部分人都有能力继续生.........
没仔细排版，见谅。
I remember my father telling me, “The eyes of God are on us always.”
The man who remembers is Judah Rosenthal, a respected ophthal-mologist and community leader. As Woody Allen’s Crimes and Misdemean-orsopens, he is being honored at a banquet. He lives on three acres in Connecticut, drives a Jaguar, built a new wing on .........
这是和U在碎碎念的时候的一些感想，当时老是睡不着，啥都不想干，然后把这事发给她了，喝口水，眼一闭，马上就睡着了。
早上起来，甚觉果然黑夜是个好东西。
一家之言，随便看看。
我觉得伍迪艾伦应该不是真正的讽刺上帝说，他只是讽刺的是人们所妄加猜测，且塑造的上帝的形象；觉得他所反对的是人们盲目所崇拜的（可被人塑造的）上帝的形象，而这形象是.........
用豆瓣App扫码，找人聊聊这部电影。没有豆瓣App？
以下豆列推荐
······
(假想工程师)
(无心恋战)
(东方快车)
谁在看这部电影
······
订阅罪与错的评论:
& 2005－, all rights reserved[转发]Roger Ebert的影评
　　没仔细排版，见谅。
　　
　　I remember my father telling me, “The eyes of God are on us always.”
　　The man who remembers is Judah Rosenthal, a respected ophthal-mologist and community leader. As Woody Allen’s Crimes and Misdemean-orsopens, he is being honored at a banquet. He lives on three acres in Connecticut, drives a Jaguar, built a new wing on the hospital. During the course of the movie he will be responsible for the murder of a woman who loves him.
　　
　　She dies not because of his passion but for his convenience. In this
　　darkest and most cynical Allen comedy—yes, comedy—he not only gets away with murder but even finds it possible, after a few months, to view the experience in a positive light. If the eyes of God are on him always, what does that say about God?
　　
　　Woody Allen has made mo the best are Annie
　　Hall(1976), Hannah and Her Sisters(1987), Crimes and Misdemeanors(1989), and Match Point, which premiered at Cannes 2005. The new film resembles Crimes and Misdemeanors in the way it involves a man who commits murder to cover up an affair, but Match Pointis more firmly a film noir, and Crimes is frankly a complaint against God for turning a blind eye on evil.
　　
　　Judah, played by Martin Landau as a man of probity and vast self-importance, is, or thinks he is, a moral man. That has not prevented him from having an affair for two years with Dolores (Anjelica Huston), a flight attendant with whom he has walked on the beach and discussed marriage.
　　
　　But Judah will never divorce his wife, Miriam (Claire Bloom), to marry Dolores. Nor is he capable of confessing his sin to Miriam: “Miriam won’t forgive me,” he tells a rabbi. “She’ll be broken. She idealizes me.” That the conversation with the rabbi is imaginary takes away nothing from its ruth-lessness. What Judah is arguing is that Dolores must die because if Miriam found out about the affair it would—what? Destroy Miriam? Dolores? No, it would destroy his image and stature in the eyes of his wife and his community, and he thinks that is worth killing for.
　　
　　To be sure, Judah backs into murder. Dolores has been acting dan-gerously. She sent a letter to Miriam that Judah only barely intercepted. She called from a gas station ten minutes down the road, threatening to come to his house and tell Miriam “what she needs to know.” Judah discusses his problem with his brother Jack ( Jerry Orbach), who has connections with the Mafia. “They’ll handle it,” Jack tells him. Handle? “I can’t believe I’m talking about a human being,” Judah says. “She’s not just an insect to be stepped on. . . .”
　　Yet he steps on her. Dolores knows about certain “financial impro-prieties” that J funds from one place were useful in another. Threatened with exposure on both fronts, Judah makes a call to Jack, and Jack calls back: “It’s taken care of.” Now listen to Judah: “I can’t speak. I’m in shock. God have mercy on us, Jack.” How about a little mercy for Dolores? Judah has mastered the art of ameliorating his crime by being shocked at it. Yes, he had Dolores killed—but if he feels terrible about it, doesn’t that prove he’s not an entirely bad man?
　　
　　The movie intercuts this tragic story with a comedy, also about adul-tery. The technique is Shakespearean: the crimes of kings are mirrored for comic effect in the foibles of the lower orders. Allen plays Cliff Stern, a maker of documentaries of in one, an old man in thick glasses discusses metaphysics. Cliff is married to Wendy ( Joanna Gleason).
　　
　　She has two brothers: Ben (Sam Waterston), the rabbi, who is going blind and is being treated by Judah, and Lester (Alan Alda), the creator of incred-ibly successful TV sitcoms.
　　
　　Cliff detests Lester. Consider the scene where we first see the two
　　 Lester is on the left flanked by his sister and another woman, holding court. Cliff is on the right, slightly more in the foreground, and half-turned away from the action and toward us. He seems barely able to prevent himself from turning to the camera and telling us directly what a jerk Lester is. The visual strategy is subtle but wonderful: Allen delivers a monologue using only body language.
　　
　　Cliff is offered a job directing a documentary about Lester. “You
　　weren’t my first choice,” the Alda character cheerfully tells him. “I’m doing it as a favor to my sister.” While making the film, Cliff meets a production assistant named Halley (Mia Farrow) and falls for her. They have a little non- Cliff is not made for big affairs, but for modest displays of erotic self-deprecation. He proposes marriage to her, despite the fact that he has barely kissed her and is obviously married to Wendy.
　　
　　So now we have two married men discussing marriage with other
　　women. That Judah will not really marry Dolores destroys her (“I was at a low point when I met you!” she cries in raw emotion. “You turned every-thing around!”). That Cliff might actually marry Halley, or thinks he might, is fielded by her with tact: she announces a trip to London, thinks they ought to “have some time apart,” and returns engaged to—yes, Lester. Cliff is morally offended by her choice, despite the inarguable fact that Lester is single and available (and also rich and successful), and Cliff is married, poor, and has been fired from the documentary after a scene comparing Lester to Mussolini.
　　
　　The Woody Allen scenes provide the kind of stand-up self-analysis
　　and kvetching that his characters are famous for. But what happens in the Martin Landau scenes are as calmly shocking as anything Allen has ever done. In that imaginary conversation with the rabbi, Judah refers to his brother’s offer to “take care” of Dolores. “God is a luxury I can’t afford,” he says. “Jack lives in the real world. You live in the kingdom of heaven.” After Judah learns that Dolores has been killed, he visits Dolores’s apartment, sees that she is indeed dead, and takes her address book and other papers that might link him with her.
　　
　　“Four months later,” we’re told in a subtitle, the principal characters
　　are gathered at a wedding. Cliff wanders off, outraged at seeing Halley with the despised Lester. Why should a worthless parasite like Lester get the girl? Judah wanders in the same direction, and the two men have a curious conversation. It turns on the idea of a perfect murder. Judah describes “a murder plot” to Cliff. It is the murder he has gotten away with.
　　
　　But how does it feel to be responsible for the death of another per-son? Can you live with yourself? “Suddenly it’s not an empty universe at all,” Judah tells Cliff. God occupies it, and has eyes, and sees. “The man is an inch away from confessing to the police.” Then suddenly one morning, he wakes up, the sun is shining, his life is good, and he has returned to “his protected world of wealth and privilege.” The moral of this story?
　　
　　“We define ourselves by the choices we make,” Judah says. By choosing to have Dolores murdered, Judah has defined himself as a man of wealth and privilege, respected by society, “idolized” by his wife, and a murderer. He can live with that.
　　
　　The implications of Crimes and Misdemeanorsare bleak and hope-less. The evil are rewarded, the blameless are punished, and the rabbi goes blind. To be sure, justice is done in the low-road plot: Cliff does not succeed in leaving his wife to marry a girl for whom he would be the worst possible partner, and the rich and triumphant Lester gets the girl and will possibly make her happy, or at least rich. But in the main story Dolores lies in her grave, and Judah finds that life goes on—for him, at least. For Martin Landau, the performance is a masterpiece of smooth, practiced diplomacy,
　　as he glides through life and leaves his problems behind. Landau is never more effective than when he is shocked and dismayed at his own behavior. It’s as if he’s regarding himself from outside, with a kind of fascination. He sees what he does, and does nothing to stop it. In his own world, he is the eyes of God.
分享到微信
　　翻译一下惹
喜剧 / 剧情
伍迪·艾伦
Bill Bernstein / 马丁·兰道 / 克莱尔·布鲁姆 / Stephanie Roth Haberle
& 2005－, all rights reserved罪与错 Crimes and Misdemeanors
罪与错的图片
······
罪与错的获奖情况
······
第62届奥斯卡金像奖
最佳导演(提名)
第62届奥斯卡金像奖
最佳男配角(提名)
第62届奥斯卡金像奖
最佳原创剧本(提名)
喜欢这部电影的人也喜欢
······
评论被折叠，是因为发布这条评论的帐号行为异常。评论仍可以被展开阅读，对发布人的账号不造成其他影响。如果认为有问题，可以豆瓣电影。
关于《罪与错》的问题
· · · · · ·
罪与错的影评
······
人的一生会遇到这样那样的事，只不过下层人民不善表达，生活的喜怒哀乐都融进了血液，上层人的光线与阴暗都深深埋葬于岁月之中，唯有中产，董文学，会文艺，诗词书画样样精通，可以通过各种形式表现人声的飞扬与落寞。
中产的思想很复杂，他们有一定的财富积累，有一定的社会地位，受过高等教育，看待问题早脱离了简单的才米油盐范围。对文学、艺术等方面的素养.........
16/16&有用
这可能是伍迪彻底告别过去的一部电影。
对伯格曼的戏仿以及由此带来的信仰讨论问题依旧，但他已不再执着于上帝是否存在，而是何时出现（犯罪之后），存在于何处（一颗受过宗教影响但从不信仰，却由于罪恶突然开始忏悔的心）。眼科医生的故事各种《罪与罚》上身，陀爷伯格曼老伍迪永远是三位一体，OMG。
伍迪早已认定情幻虚空，这一点从他自己的（据说从《星尘往事》起，他.........
“我们一生中都要不断面对痛苦的抉择、道德抉择。有的选择还意义重大，大部分都是鸡毛蒜皮的小事，但是，我们做什么样的选择就决定了我们是什么样的人。我们实际上是我们所做的选择的总和，世事难料，生活也有诸多不平之事，在上帝造物的时候，仿佛没有考虑到人类幸福这件事，只有靠我们自己每个人爱的能力不同才会赋予这个无情的宇宙以意义。但是，大部分人都有能力继续生.........
没仔细排版，见谅。
I remember my father telling me, “The eyes of God are on us always.”
The man who remembers is Judah Rosenthal, a respected ophthal-mologist and community leader. As Woody Allen’s Crimes and Misdemean-orsopens, he is being honored at a banquet. He lives on three acres in Connecticut, drives a Jaguar, built a new wing on .........
这是和U在碎碎念的时候的一些感想，当时老是睡不着，啥都不想干，然后把这事发给她了，喝口水，眼一闭，马上就睡着了。
早上起来，甚觉果然黑夜是个好东西。
一家之言，随便看看。
我觉得伍迪艾伦应该不是真正的讽刺上帝说，他只是讽刺的是人们所妄加猜测，且塑造的上帝的形象；觉得他所反对的是人们盲目所崇拜的（可被人塑造的）上帝的形象，而这形象是.........
用豆瓣App扫码，找人聊聊这部电影。没有豆瓣App？
以下豆列推荐
······
(假想工程师)
(无心恋战)
(东方快车)
谁在看这部电影
······
订阅罪与错的评论:
& 2005－, all rights reserved