行业资讯：
&>&HR总监专访
专访阿克苏诺贝尔中国区学习与发展经理 张影女士
关键人才发展的“关键策略”
只有本站会员才能浏览全部文章，请您
第一资源活动&会展
调研报告下载
2014年人力资源外包评选获奖机构/个人
最具品牌影响力奖任仕达(中国)
最佳云计算实践奖ADP China
最佳品牌建设奖 蓝海集团
最佳蓝领派遣奖英格玛集团
最佳招聘服务整合奖万宝盛华集团（中国）
最佳服务创新奖仕邦人力资源
最佳客户服务满意度奖中企人力
卓越RPO服务奖东浩人力资源
卓越灵活用工解决方案奖科锐国际
人力资源外包卓越推动者中国国际技术智力合作公司外企服务分公司总经理
2014 中国先锋人力资源总监/服务商
陈黎明 先生华硕电脑人才储备中心总监
孙方 先生交通银行培训中心副主任
吴滨 先生易居中国联合创始人易居中国房地产学院院长兼易居营销集团首席人才官（C H O ）
翁文杰 先生银天下集团战略人力资源总监
冼欣蒂 女士联邦快递中国区人力资源部和亚太区人力资源服务中心董事总经理
颜麟 先生雅居乐集团行政中心副总监雅居乐地产管理学院执行院长
周风华 女士印孚瑟斯技术（中国）有限公司人力资源总监
HR行业活动&会展
微信公众平台
如何添加“第一资源”微信公众平台？
1、二维码扫描：可在手机上登录微信选择“添加朋友”=》扫一扫，将摄像头对准二维码图片约2~3秒、即可识别并加载微信的基本资料，添加好友；
2、按号码查找：通过输入“微信公众账号/微信号”查找添加好友；
微信公众账号：第一资源
微信号：tophr-China
卓越人力资源服务解决方案
合作伙伴：
友情链接：
CopyRight& Tophr.Net, All Rights Reserved Tel:021- Fax:021-中国领导力素质国际训练中心;LD系统;力量系统;青少年训练营销;企业内训;教练技术 - 罗贝尔
通知公告：
最新资讯 /ZiXun
| 训练动态 /DontTai
你不知道你，所以你是你；如果你知道你，你就不是你了……
罗贝尔官方微信扫描或查找关注成都新动态国际英语学校 - 成都英语培训机构
忙时请拨： 欢迎垂询
工作时间: 09：00-22：00
非工作日: 09：00-18：00
*中文名字：
方便老师准确称呼您，请尽量填写准确姓名，可输入2-6个汉字
*手机号码：
请输入正确号码，以确保正常上课
*设置密码：
密码由6-16位半角字符（字符、数字、符号）组成，区分大小写!
*请选择体验课程：
请选择课程
青少年口语
零基础口语
正在为您注册,
请稍后 ...
累计培训2528901学员，正在上课学员714人
已经是会员，请
成都英语培训机构
成都新动态国际英语学校
　　新动态诺贝尔国际英语学校是中国投资机构与美国岱恩国际教育机构合作的英语学校；在成都时代广场的中心是诺贝尔国际英语在西南地区的第一中心，也是西南地区第一家拥有多元法教学能力的英语培训机构。教学系统历经16年有着在全球70多个国家成功的实践经验。 教学方法“多元法”进入中国5年来风靡北京上海等大城市，所到之处给渴望学习英语的人们带来了福音；仅仅5年时间，其社会效果和对学英语人们产生的魅力已经超过了知名的外国语大学，成为中国英语教育史上新的里程碑。　　我们创造了一个如同置身海外、受所有学习英语成功者推崇的—真实的英语母语环境：全部由外籍教师授课，结合先进的多媒体教育技术，并组织英语沙龙和丰富多彩的课外活动，欣赏原版英语影片，让学员与外教的充分交流中掌握纯正，通过各种场合提高英语交流能力。　　诺贝尔国际英语的教学方式是将有指导的多媒体教学与有明确目的小班课堂教学有机地结合，发挥各自的长处，弥补各自的短处，通过扎实、有针对性的、有效的学习，逐步在学习者头脑中形成英语语言的框架，以获取用英语进行交流的能力。这一结合的教学方式已被事实证明是最有效地将科学的理念通过专业的方法得以实现学习模式。　　英语教学面临的最大挑战就是寻找一种方法,解决有关成人教育的问题。传统的教学方法是集体学习,课程有固定的时间限制,无法满足上班族和其他一些特殊人群的需求。诺贝尔国际英语为帮助他们实现提高英语水平的理想，创造了一个全新的机会： 这种课程由学生自己设定学习目标,决定上课时间和学习进度,适合不同学习速度、不同学习频度、不同学习能力和不同时间安排的人,其灵活的方式和充足的时间保证了学生的学习质量。　　诺贝尔国际英语为学生提供了一个温馨、专业、激励的环境，使每一个人轻松地实现既定的目标。 诺贝尔国际英语采用的是全外教4人以下小班授课方式，师资力量雄厚，所有外籍教师均来自北美和英联邦国家, 具有资格证书及丰富的教学经验。 　　课程介绍：　　教学目的与教学要求：能主动用英语对话，能描述日常生活中的简单事务，谈论个人生活。能用过去，现在及将来时态，能进行简单辩论。 教学要求：学生首先上机学习达到对课文熟练掌握的程度，外教小班课对应教案对所学Let's Go软件的每个单元进行复习，对学生上机学的成果以口头操练的形式进行实际测试。授课采用交流式教学法。研讨课增加口头练习的机会，同时增加词汇量及句型结构。再通过补充课，增加学生对西方文化及时事热门话题的了解机会，增强表达能力。教学要求形式活泼，趣味浓厚，提高学生学习的兴趣。　　使用教材：First English（Units1–8）,the Lost Secret, Clear Speech Works 　　总课时量：120小时-150小时　　联系方式：　　地址：成都总府路2号时代广场16层　　电话：028-185250&&&&&&& &&&&&&&& &&&&&&&
Copyright 2015 by
education group all right reserved
&& 学 找 上！ 国内最专业的平台！ ICP监督：°(?)?1210?????????????
Obamas Acceptance of Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo
°???佱??&
Oslo City HallOslo, Norway
?? 1/2
THE PRESIDENT: Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, distinguished members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, citizens of America, and citizens of the world:
??λ???????Norwegian Nobel Committee???繫?
I receive this honor with deep gratitude and great humility. It is an award that speaks to our highest aspirations -- that for all the cruelty and hardship of our world, we are not mere prisoners of fate. Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice.
??м?????Dz???ж?????巽?
And yet I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the considerable controversy that your generous decision has generated. (Laughter.) In part, this is because I am at the beginning, and not the end, of my labors on the world stage. Compared to some of the giants of history whove received this prize -- Schweitzer and K Marshall and Mandela -- my accomplishments are slight. And then there are the men and women around the world who have been jailed and beaten in th those who toil in humanitarian organizations
the unrecognized millions whose quiet acts of courage and compassion inspire even the most hardened cynics. I cannot argue with those who find these men and women -- some known, some obscure to all but those they help -- to be far more deserving of this honor than I.
?м????飬???Цв?????????'??β??Щ???Schweitzer·(King)Ъ(Marshall)(Mandela)?ij??????????Щ????м????????ж?????????Щ????Щ?Щ????????
But perhaps the most profound issue surrounding my receipt of this prize is the fact that I am the Commander-in-Chief of the military of a nation in the midst of two wars. One of these wars is winding down. The other is a conflict that A one in which we are joined by 42 other countries -- including Norway -- in an effort to defend ourselves and all nations from further attacks.
?й???????????β?ij?а??42????DZ?й??
Still, we are at war, and Im responsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle in a distant land. Some will kill, and some will be killed. And so I come here with an acute sense of the costs of armed conflict -- filled with difficult questions about the relationship between war and peace, and our effort to replace one with the other.
?????Dz???Щ???Щ??????????огй??????ú?????
Now these questions are not new. War, in one form or another, appeared with the first man. At the dawn of history, its moralit it was simply a fact, like drought or disease -- the manner in which tribes and then civilizations sought power and settled their differences.
Щ????????????????????????
And over time, as codes of law sought to control violence within groups, so did philosophers and clerics and statesmen seek to regulate the destructive power of war. The concept of a just war emerged, suggesting that war is justified only when certain conditions were met: if it is waged as a last resort or in self- if the force
and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared from violence.
?????淶ij????μ???????γ???? 1/4 ?????λ??????п?????
Of course, we know that for most of history, this concept of just war was rarely observed. The capacity of human beings to think up new ways to kill one another proved inexhaustible, as did our capacity to exempt from mercy those who look different or pray to a different God. Wars between armies gave way to wars between nations -- total wars in which the distinction between combatant and civilian became blurred. In the span of 30 years, such carnage would twice engulf this continent. And while its hard to conceive of a cause more just than the defeat of the Third Reich and the Axis powers, World War II was a conflict in which the total number of civilians who died exceeded the number of soldiers who perished.
?????????????u???????Щò?????????????????30 1/2 ???????Third Reich?Axis powers????????
In the wake of such destruction, and with the advent of the nuclear age, it became clear to victor and vanquished alike that the world needed institutions to prevent another world war. And so, a quarter century after the United States Senate rejected the League of Nations -- an idea for which Woodrow Wilson received this prize -- America led the world in constructing an architecture to keep the peace: a Marshall Plan and a United Nations, mechanisms to govern the waging of war, treaties to protect human rights, prevent genocide, restrict the most dangerous weapons.
????????????з???????????League of Nations?????Woodrow Wilson????罨???Ъ?(Marshall Plan)????淶????Σ??
In many ways, these efforts succeeded. Yes, terrible wars have been fought, and atrocities committed. But there has been no Third World War. The Cold War ended with jubilant crowds dismantling a wall. Commerce has stitched much of the world together. Billions have been lifted from poverty. The ideals of liberty and self-determination, equality and the rule of law have haltingly advanced. We are the heirs of the fortitude and foresight of generations past, and it is a legacy for which my own country is rightfully proud.
Щ??????u???????б????????ó??????ɡ????ε????????????????е?
And yet, a decade into a new century, this old architecture is buckling under the weight of new threats. The world may no longer shudder at the prospect of war between two nuclear superpowers, but proliferation may increase the risk of catastrophe. Terrorism has long been a tactic, but modern technology allows a few small men with outsized rage to murder innocents on a horrific scale.
??10???е?????в?????????????Σ?????Σ???С?u????
Moreover, wars between nations have increasingly given way to wars within nations. The resurgence of ethnic or the growth of secessionist movements, insurgencies, and failed states -- all these things have increasingly trapped civilians in unending chaos. In todays wars, many more civilians are
the seeds of future conflict are sown, economies are wrecked, civil societies torn asunder, refugees amassed, children scarred.
??汻???????????????????С??У???δ???????γ?????
I do not bring with me today a definitive solution to the problems of war. What I do know is that meeting these challenges will require the same vision, hard work, and persistence of those men and women who acted so boldly decades ago. And it will require us to think in new ways about the notions of just war and the imperatives of a just peace.
??д???????Щ??м??Щ?η?е????Ρ??u????????
We must begin by acknowledging the hard truth: We will not eradicate violent conflict in our lifetimes. There will be times when nations -- acting individually or in concert -- will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified.
DZ??????Dz??Щ????ж???衣
I make this statement mindful of what Martin Luther King Jr. said in this same ceremony years ago: Violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones. As someone who stands here as a direct consequence of Dr. Kings life work, I am living testimony to the moral force of non-violence. I know theres nothing weak -- nothing passive -- nothing na&ve -- in the creed and lives of Gandhi and King.
????·Martin Luther King Jr.????????ú???u???????????DZ???????Gandhi·У档
But as a head of state sworn to protect and defend my nation, I cannot be guided by their examples alone. I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people. For make no mistake: Evil does exist in the world. A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitlers armies. Negotiations cannot convince al Qaedas leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force may sometimes be necessary is not a call to cynicism -- it is a re the imperfections of man and the limits of reason.
?????????????????磬??в?????а????DZ???????в??al Qaeda?????DZ?IJ??÷dz?IJ??
I raise this point, I begin with this point because in many countries there is a deep ambivalence about military action today, no matter what the cause. And at times, this is joined by a reflexive suspicion of America, the worlds sole military superpower.
?????????ж?????ì?ì??Ω?ij???IJΡ
But the world must remember that it was not simply international institutions -- not just treaties and declarations -- that brought stability to a post-World War II world. Whatever mistakes we have made, the plain fact is this: The United States of America has helped underwrite global security for more than six decades with the blood of our citizens and the strength of our arms. The service and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform has promoted peace and prosperity from Germany to Korea, and enabled democracy to take hold in places like the Balkans. We have borne this burden not because we seek to impose our will. We have done so out of enlightened self-interest -- because we seek a better future for our children and grandchildren, and we believe that their lives will be better if others children and grandchildren can live in freedom and prosperity.
?????????????????60??????????????????????????dzЩ??????dz??????δ???У?á
So yes, the instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace. And yet this truth must coexist with another -- that no matter how justified, war promises human tragedy. The soldiers courage and sacrifice is full of glory, expressing devotion to country, to cause, to comrades in arms. But war itself is never glorious, and we must never trumpet it as such.
?????????оá?????????硣?,?????????????????
So part of our challenge is reconciling these two seemingly inreconcilable truths -- that war is sometimes necessary, and war at some level is an expression of human folly. Concretely, we must direct our effort to the task that President Kennedy called for long ago. Let us focus, he said, on a more practical, more attainable peace, based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual evolution in human institutions. A gradual evolution of human institutions.
????????????ij??????DZ????Kennedy?????????????????????????
What might this evolution look like? What might these practical steps be?
??к?Щ?еIJ裿
To begin with, I believe that all nations -- strong and weak alike -- must adhere to standards that govern the use of force. I -- like any head of state -- reserve the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend my nation. Nevertheless, I am convinced that adhering to standards, international standards, strengthens those who do, and isolates and weakens those who dont.
??й??????淶κι???????ж???????????Щ??????
The world rallied around America after the 9/11 attacks, and continues to support our efforts in Afghanistan, because of the horror of those senseless attacks and the recognized principle of self-defense. Likewise, the world recognized the need to confront Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait -- a consensus that sent a clear message to all about the cost of aggression.
9.11??????????????IJ????????•Saddam Hussein????俹????????
Furthermore, America -- in fact, no nation -- can insist that others follow the rules of the road if we refuse to follow them ourselves. For when we dont, our actions appear arbitrary and undercut the legitimacy of future interventions, no matter how justified.
??κι??????Dz?ж?????δи????????
And this becomes particularly important when the purpose of military action extends beyond self-defense or the defense of one nation against an aggressor. More and more, we all confront difficult questions about how to prevent the slaughter of civilians by their own government, or to stop a civil war whose violence and suffering can engulf an entire region.
ж?ij?ij????ж??????????η???????кu????
I believe that force can be justified on humanitarian grounds, as it was in the Balkans, or in other places that have been scarred by war. Inaction tears at our conscience and can lead to more costly intervention later. Thats why all responsible nations must embrace the role that militaries with a clear mandate can play to keep the peace.
????????????ж????δ????и??иε?????ж????á
Americas commitment to global security will never waver. But in a world in which threats are more diffuse, and missions more complex, America cannot act alone. America alone cannot secure the peace. This is true in Afghanistan. This is true in failed states like Somalia, where terrorism and piracy is joined by famine and human suffering. And sadly, it will continue to be true in unstable regions for years to come.
??????в?????жж???????漢?????????????
The leaders and soldiers of NATO countries, and other friends and allies, demonstrate this truth through the capacity and courage theyve shown in Afghanistan. But in many countries, there is a disconnect between the efforts of those who serve and the ambivalence of the broader public. I understand why war is not popular, but I also know this: The belief that peace is desirable is rarely enough to achieve it. Peace requires responsibility. Peace entails sacrifice. Thats why NATO continues to be indispensable. Thats why we must strengthen U.N. and regional peacekeeping, and not leave the task to a few countries. Thats why we honor those who return home from peacekeeping and training abroad to Oslo and R to Ottawa and S to Dhaka and Kigali -- we honor them not as makers of war, but of wagers -- but as wagers of peace.
?????????????У???ì?????????????????еΡ????б??DZ???ж?ж????? 1/2 ?????Щ?ж????輫?Dz?????
Let me make one final point about the use of force. Even as we make difficult decisions about going to war, we must also think clearly about how we fight it. The Nobel Committee recognized this truth in awarding its first prize for peace to Henry Dunant -- the founder of the Red Cross, and a driving force behind the Geneva Conventions.
???????????????濼βμ?????Henry Dunant???????????Red Cross'???Geneva Conventions??
Where force is necessary, we have a moral and strategic interest in binding ourselves to certain rules of conduct. And even as we confront a vicious adversary that abides by no rules, I believe the United States of America must remain a standard bearer in the conduct of war. That is what makes us different from those whom we fight. That is a source of our strength. That is why I prohibited torture. That is why I ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed. And that is why I have reaffirmed Americas commitment to abide by the Geneva Conventions. We lose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fight to defend. (Applause.) And we honor -- we honor those ideals by upholding them not when its easy, but when it is hard.
б????dz??????ijЩ?????κιа???????淶????????????????????????Щ???????Щ???μ?Щ?塣
I have spoken at some length to the question that must weigh on our minds and our hearts as we choose to wage war. But let me now turn to our effort to avoid such tragic choices, and speak of three ways that we can build a just and lasting peace.
?????????????????????е???????ú??
First, in dealing with those nations that break rules and laws, I believe that we must develop alternatives to violence that are tough enough to actually change behavior -- for if we want a lasting peace, then the words of the international community must mean something. Those regimes that break the rules must be held accountable. Sanctions must exact a real price. Intransigence must be met with increased pressure -- and such pressure exists only when the world stands together as one.
?Щ??????DZ??Щ???????????????ú???????еΡ??????????????????п??
One urgent example is the effort to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, and to seek a world without them. In the middle of the last century, nations agreed to be bound by a treaty whose bargain is clear: All will have access to pe those without nuclear weapo and those with nuclear weapons will work towards disarmament. I am committed to upholding this treaty. It is a centerpiece of my foreign policy. And Im working with President Medvedev to reduce America and Russias nuclear stockpiles.
???????к?ü????????????ú??к????к???ü??????????÷Τ?Medvedev??????к
But it is also incumbent upon all of us to insist that nations like Iran and North Korea do not game the system. Those who claim to respect international law cannot avert their eyes when those laws are flouted. Those who care for their own security cannot ignore the danger of an arms race in the Middle East or East Asia. Those who seek peace cannot stand idly by as nations arm themselves for nuclear war.
??μ?????????Щ???????ж?Σ?????Щ?????
The same principle applies to those who violate international laws by brutalizing their own people. When there is genocide in Darfur, systematic rape in Congo, repression in Burma -- there must be consequences. Yes, ther yes, there will be diplomacy -- but there must be consequences when those things fail. And the closer we stand together, the less likely we will be faced with the choice between armed intervention and complicity in oppression.
???ЩΥ?п?????? 1/4 ??ж????н???жЩ?Ч??е???б???????
This brings me to a second point -- the nature of the peace that we seek. For peace is not merely the absence of visible conflict. Only a just peace based on the inherent rights and dignity of every individual can truly be lasting.
??????????ζ?п?ij??л????ij?ú?
It was this insight that drove drafters of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights after the Second World War. In the wake of devastation, they recognized that if human rights are not protected, peace is a hollow promise.
?????????Universal Declaration of Human Rights??????ò?????ij?
And yet too often, these words are ignored. For some countries, the failure to uphold human rights is excused by the false suggestion that these are somehow Western principles, foreign to local cultures or stages of a nations development. And within America, there has long been a tension between those who describe themselves as realists or idealists -- a tension that suggests a stark choice between the narrow pursuit of interests or an endless campaign to impose our values around the world.
????????ijЩ???????????ε???IJ??Щ????????ì?????????
I reject these choices. I believe that peace is unstable where citizens are denied the right to speak freely or wo choose their own leaders or assemble without fear. Pent-up grievances fester, and the suppression of tribal and religious identity can lead to violence. We also know that the opposite is true. Only when Europe became free did it finally find peace. America has never fought a war against a democracy, and our closest friends are governments that protect the rights of their citizens. No matter how callously defined, neither Americas interests -- nor the worlds -- are served by the denial of human aspirations.
??Щ??Щ??????????????Dz????IJ???????????????к????????DZ乫?????綨???棬?档
So even as we respect the unique culture and traditions of different countries, America will always be a voice for those aspirations that are universal. We will bear witness to the quiet dignity of reformers like Aung Sang Suu K to the bravery of Zimbabweans who cast their ballots in
to the hundreds of thousands who have marched silently through the streets of Iran. It is telling that the leaders of these governments fear the aspirations of their own people more than the power of any other nation. And it is the responsibility of all free people and free nations to make clear that these movements -- these movements of hope and history -- they have us on their side.
??????????????Щ???????Aung Sang Suu Kyiг???????μ????Τ????????е??Щ?Щ???ηκ???????棬?Щж??ж??
Let me also say this: The promotion of human rights cannot be about exhortation alone. At times, it must be coupled with painstaking diplomacy. I know that engagement with repressive regimes lacks the satisfying purity of indignation. But I also know that sanctions without outreach -- condemnation without discussion -- can carry forward only a crippling status quo. No repressive regime can move down a new path unless it has the choice of an open door.
???????????????????ó????ζ??????ζ??ж????к?κ????п?ij·
In light of the Cultural Revolutions horrors, Nixons meeting with Mao appeared inexcusable -- and yet it surely helped set China on a path where millions of its citizens have been lifted from poverty and connected to open societies. Pope John Pauls engagement with Poland created space not just for the Catholic Church, but for labor leaders like Lech Walesa. Ronald Reagans efforts on arms control and embrace of perestroika not only improved relations with the Soviet Union, but empowered dissidents throughout Eastern Europe. Theres no simple formula here. But we must try as best we can to balance isolation and engagement, pressure and incentives, so that human rights and dignity are advanced over time.
????????????й?·?й????????Pope John Paul?????????кLech Walesa??????Ronald Reagan??????????ij????????DZ?????????????
Third, a just peace includes not only civil and political rights -- it must encompass economic security and opportunity. For true peace is not just freedom from fear, but freedom from want.
???????????壬???
It is undoubtedly true that development rarely takes r it is also true that security does not exist where human beings do not have access to enough food, or clean water, or the medicine and shelter they need to survive. It does not exist where children cant aspire to a decent education or a job that supports a family. The absence of hope can rot a society from within.
???а??????????????а???????п?????а????
And thats why helping farmers feed their own people -- or nations educate their children and care for the sick -- is not mere charity. Its also why the world must come together to confront climate change. There is little scientific dispute that if we do nothing, we will face more drought, more famine, more mass displacement -- all of which will fuel more conflict for decades. For this reason, it is not merely scientists and environmental activists who call for swift and forceful action -- its military leaders in my own country and others who understand our common security hangs in the balance.
????????????????仯??????ж?????????жδ????????????ж????????????
Agreements among nations. Strong institutions. Support for human rights. Investments in development. All these are vital ingredients in bringing about the evolution that President Kennedy spoke about. And yet, I do not believe that we will have the will, the determination, the staying power, to complete this work without something more -- and thats the continued expansion of o an insistence that theres something irreducible that we all share.
Э顣??????????ж?????????????????????Dz?????ij?????
As the world grows smaller, you might think it would be easier for human beings to recogniz to understand that were all basically see that we all hope for the chance to live out our lives with some measure of happiness and fulfillment for ourselves and our families.
??С??????????????У????ij????кС
And yet somehow, given the dizzying pace of globalization, the cultural leveling of modernity, it perhaps comes as no surprise that people fear the loss of what they cherish in their particular identities -- their race, their tribe, and perhaps most powerfully their religion. In some places, this fear has led to conflict. At times, it even feels like were moving backwards. We see it in the Middle East, as the conflict between Arabs and Jews seems to harden. We see it in nations that are torn asunder by tribal lines.
??????????????塢壬???????Щ????????ж???ij????Ρij?????Ρ
And most dangerously, we see it in the way that religion is used to justify the murder of innocents by those who have distorted and defiled the great religion of Islam, and who attacked my country from Afghanistan. These extremists are not the first to kill in the name of G the cruelties of the Crusades are amply recorded. But they remind us that no Holy War can ever be a just war. For if you truly believe that you are carrying out divine will, then there is no need for restraint -- no need to spare the pregnant mother, or the medic, or the Red Cross worker, or even a person of ones own faith. Such a warped view of religion is not just incompatible with the concept of peace, but I believe its incompatible with the very purpose of faith -- for the one rule that lies at the heart of every major religion is that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.
Σ????Щ????Щ?????????Щ?????????Crusades?д 1/4 Щ???????е????и????????顣???????????????????嶼???
Adhering to this law of love has always been the core struggle of human nature. For we are fallible. We make mistakes, and fall victim to the temptations of pride, and power, and sometimes evil. Even those of us with the best of intentions will at times fail to right the wrongs before us.
????????????а??Щ???δ?б?
But we do not have to think that human nature is perfect for us to still believe that the human condition can be perfected. We do not have to live in an idealized world to still reach for those ideals that will make it a better place. The non-violence practiced by men like Gandhi and King may not have been practical or possible in every circumstance, but the love that they preached -- their fundamental faith in human progress -- that must always be the North Star that guides us on our journey.
???????????????е粻?磬???????·??DZ??к???У??????е??
For if we lose that faith -- if we dismiss it as silly or na& if we divorce it from the decisions that we make on issues of war and peace -- then we lose whats best about humanity. We lose our sense of possibility. We lose our moral compass.
??????м????????????????????????
Like generations have before us, we must reject that future. As Dr. King said at this occasion so many years ago, I refuse to accept despair as the final response to the ambiguities of history. I refuse to accept the idea that the isness of mans present condition makes him morally incapable of reaching up for the eternal oughtness that forever confronts him.
?DZ?δ???ij??????????ν?????(isness)???????????oughtness
Let us reach for the world that ought to be -- that spark of the divine that still stirs within each of our souls. (Applause.)
????????????м
Somewhere today, in the here and now, in the world as it is, a soldier sees hes outgunned, but stands firm to keep the peace. Somewhere today, in this world, a young protestor awaits the brutality of her government, but has the courage to march on. Somewhere today, a mother facing punishing poverty still takes the time to teach her child, scrapes together what few coins she has to send that child to school -- because she believes that a cruel world still has a place for that childs dreams.
?ij?????????????????ij????λ???IJп????ij???λ???????????е?Щ?????п?????????
Let us live by their example. We can acknowledge that oppression will always be with us, and still strive for justice. We can admit the intractability of depravation, and still strive for dignity. Clear-eyed, we can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace. We can do that -- for that is the sto thats the h and at this moment of challenge, that must be our work here on Earth.
??????????塣??????????????????????????u?
Thank you very much. (Applause.)лλ
Copyright @ All Rights Reserved ????У ?
У??н·188??绰&&